Chapter 24 – Sugar Creek Township, History of Armstrong County Pennsylvania

Chapter 24
Sugar Creek

line

A Small Remnant of the Parent Township-Original Owners-Conveyances-Ezekiel
Lewis and other Pioneers-The Middlesex Presbyterian Church-St. PatrickĂ¯Â¿Â½s
Roman Catholic Church-The Donation Lands-Lutheran Church-Robert Orr, Sr.-Orrsville-Damages
of the Tornado of 1860-Sugar Creek and Phillipsburg Ferry Company-Templeton
Oilwell-Census and School Statistics-Geology.

The present township of Sugar Creek is a comparatively small remnant of the
parent one, left after organizing from what was its original territory,
besides the portions of it included in East and West Franklin, 4 townships, 2
boroughs and 1 city.

In the southeastern part is the tract, nearly a square, 356 acres and 147
perches, which appears from the Gapen map to have been claimed by Samuel
Kincaide, but the other map shows it to have been the Michael Red tract, about
one-half of which is in what is now Washington Township. Red probably settled
on it the latter part of the last century. He was assessed, in 1805, with 400
acres, 1 horse and 2 cows, at $142, and the next year, with 300 acres and 4
cattle, at $122, and with 2 distilleries in 1812. RedĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs conveyed it as
containing 356 acres to Thomas R. McMillen, September 23, 1840, for $100, of
which 130 acres were then cleared, and on which were a stone dwelling-house, a
square log barn, stillhouse [sic] and other buildings, a meadow, and apple and
peach-orchards. McMillen conveyed it to Patrick Red, December 3, 1851, for $5,
who by his will dated March 15, and registered June 6, 1854, devised it to his
son Charles, the present owner.

Adjoining that Red tract on the north is a tract, a rectangular
parallelogram, 386 acres and 136 perches, partly in Washington township, to
which Robert Beaty once had a claim, and on which David Henry settled about
1797, with 300 acres of which, 2 horses and 2 cows, he was assessed in 1805
and 1806 at $212, and which was surveyed to him by Ross, deputy surveyor,
March 5, 1805. He agreed to convey 162 acres and 136 perches of the
northwestern portion of which were surveyed in his lifetime to his son,
Stewart Henry, to whom Alexander and Nathaniel Henry, Mrs. Margaret Colwell
and the other heirs released that parcel October 8, 1838. He and his
son-in-law, James Hutchison, entered into a written agreement march 27, 1850,
for the sale and purchase of 100 acres in consideration of the vendorĂ¯Â¿Â½s
proper maintenance during the rest of his live, in pursuance of which the
vendee removed thither and entered upon the due performance of his part of the
agreement May 6, having given his bond in the penal sum of $2,400 conditioned
on such performance. In six weeks and four days thereafter, the vendor died.
The vendee subsequently presented his petition to the orphanĂ¯Â¿Â½s court of this
county for the specific performance of that contract, which was the first case
of the kind in which the writer was concerned after his admission to the bar.
On due proof of the contract and compliance therewith on the part of the
vendee, the court ordered and decreed the specific performance thereof April
3, 1851, and the vendorĂ¯Â¿Â½s administrator accordingly executed a deed tot he
vendee. The latter conveyed 50 acres, reserving a strip of the Summit
coal-vein in the northeast corner to Sarah Buyers and John E. Gilchrist, June
12, 1858, for $700, 120 acres and the above-mentioned strip of coal to
Catherine Olkus, February 6, 1865, for $3,250, and all his interest in that
strip of coal to Joseph Sutton, March 1, for $75. The vendorĂ¯Â¿Â½s
administrator, Stewart Henry, Jr., by order of the proper court, conveyed the
remaining 68 acres of his fatherĂ¯Â¿Â½s land to Hutchison, September 15, 1851,
for $619.65.

The other portion of the David Henry tract, 200 acres, was conveyed by
James Mechling, sheriff, in proceedings in partition, to Alexander Colwell,
Alexander Henry, and Philip Mechling, June 18, 1829, for $420, which they
conveyed to Samuel Templeton, Jr., March 9, 1830, for $600.

Adjoining the Beaty-Henry tract on the north is a rectangular one,
extending north to the line between the depreciation and donation lands, the
major portion of which is in what is now Washington township, where it will be
further noticed. Adjoining it on the west and the last-mentioned line on the
north is a hexagonal one, 296 Ă¯Â¿Â½ acres, on which John Crawford was the first
settler, and with 100 acres of which he was assessed in 1805, at $40, and the
next year with the same and 1 horse and 1 cow at $66; to whom the patent for
the entire tract was granted December 15, 1826, which he conveyed thus: To
Robert G. Crawford, 169 acres and 146 perches, October 20, 1828, for $100, of
which the latter conveyed 20 acres and 25 perches to Joseph Thomas, July 13,
1857, for $320; to Andrew Shriver, 129 acres, same day as to Robert G.
Crawford, for $—, which Shriver conveyed to Josiah Woodroe [sic], April 13,
1839, which Woodroe conveyed to Sylvanus S. White, April 5, 1841, and which
White conveyed to Solomon Wolf, November 8, 1853, for $1,300.

West of the northern and north and northwest of the southern part of that
Crawford tract is an irregularly shaped one, 390 acres and 97 perches, at one
time claimed by John Blain, on which Ezekiel Lewis made an improvement in
March, 1793, and a settlement in April, 1797, surveyed by Ross, April 23,
1802, to whom the warrant was granted March 18, 1805, and the patent September
5, 1809, in which it is called Ă¯Â¿Â½Lewisburgh [sic],Ă¯Â¿Â½ for $71.78. He was
assessed with 200 acres, 3 horses and 1 cow, in 1805, at $176, and the next
year with the same, less 1 horse, at $156.

Lewis conveyed Ă¯Â¿Â½Lewisburgh [sic]Ă¯Â¿Â½ thus: To Andrew Blair, 190 acres and
97 perches of the eastern part, December 8, 1810, for $1, 187 acres of which
Joseph Brown, sheriff, sold on judgement in favor of Andrew Kelly against
Blair – debt $118, costs $24 – to William Ayres, and conveyed the same to him,
September 17, 1816, for $167, who conveyed the same to George and William
Byers, December 29, 1819, for $400, Blair having agreed to sell it to George
Byers, in April, 1811, for $760. Adam A. Byers conveyed 90 acres and 114
perches to Joseph Thomas, February 11, 1850, for $1,050. George Byers having
died intestate, William Dickey, his administrator, by order of the orphanĂ¯Â¿Â½s
court, in proceedings in partition, conveyed 108 acres of this parcel of Ă¯Â¿Â½LewisburghĂ¯Â¿Â½
to John Moore, August 28, 1856, for $1,730.16, which the latter conveyed to
Richard Meldrun, September 6, 1864, for $2,160. Lewis conveyed 200 acres, the
western part of Ă¯Â¿Â½Lewisburgh,Ă¯Â¿Â½ to William Lewis, his son, and Peter Pence,
his son-in-law, April 17, 1832, for $400 and Ă¯Â¿Â½natural love and affection,Ă¯Â¿Â½
which they reconveyed to him, March 6, 1833; 125 or 130 acres of which the
latter conveyed to Pence, April 5, 1837, for $800. Pence agreed to convey 3
acres, Ă¯Â¿Â½a rectangular triangle,Ă¯Â¿Â½ one the southwest side of the Kittanning
and Fairview road, to James Witherow, September 7, 1846, which the latter
agreed to sell to Samuel Caldwell, March 13, 1847, for $175, which, with four
more acres, was included in PenceĂ¯Â¿Â½s deed to Caldwell for $25. Pence conveyed
86 Ă¯Â¿Â½ acres to Platt Sutton for $2,600, and 33 Ă¯Â¿Â½ acres to Joseph Thomas,
March 3, 1865, for $1,000.

There was a schoolhouse as early as 1829 in the northeastern portion of Ă¯Â¿Â½Lewisburgh,Ă¯Â¿Â½
near the intersection of the old Butler and Watterson Ferry road and the one
branching northerly from the Kittanning and BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend road, about 1 Ă¯Â¿Â½
miles from the town of Middlesex, among the earliest teachers in which were
Matthew Brown and Cyrus Kilgore.

Ezekiel Lewis was a citizen of Westmoreland county, and, in the early part
of the summer of 1781, volunteered to serve in Captain CampbellĂ¯Â¿Â½s company of
calvary, which constituted a part of Captain Robert OrrĂ¯Â¿Â½s command, which
participated in Col. Archibald LocheryĂ¯Â¿Â½s disastrous expedition down the Ohio
to aid Gen. George Rogers Clark.

Lewis was, among others, captured by the Indians at the mouth of an inlet,
since called LocheryĂ¯Â¿Â½s creek, about ten miles below the mouth of the Miami
river. He and his comrades, with their horses, were about landing from their
boats to cook their breakfasts on shore, when they encountered a shower of
bullets from a large force of Indians lying in ambush. The men shielded
themselves as far as they could by placing themselves behind their horses,
which were shot down. A number of the men were killed and others wounded, so
they were forced to surrender. After being removed to the river-bank, several
were killed. Lewis may have avoided the fate by the dark color of his hair,
for the Indians spared none with red hair. He ran the gantlet [sic] so swiftly
that the Indians could not hit him. They were then taken to Montreal, Canada,
and taken over in squads and sold to the English. They suffered so severely
from hunger while on their way, that when the Indians killed and dressed a
deer and cooked the venison with pieces of its unwashed entrails, they
relished the meal thus prepared. The squaws, when the Indians were intoxicated
with whisky, hid the prisoners to prevent their being killed, After Lewis was
sold to the English, he was clothed and well fed. He and his comrades became
weary, so he and four of them escaped, crossed the St. Lawrence and landed
near a camp where the Indians were jolly, dancing around their fire. Lewis and
his companions having discovered a young bull which the Indians had tied to a
tree, intending, no doubt, to feast on him the next day, dispatched him, cut
out the best of the meat, took it with them and concealed themselves all the
next day, and after traveling all night they were surprised to find themselves
in the morning at the point whence they had started. It so happened because
clouds obscured the star which they had learned to follow as a guide. After
seventeen daysĂ¯Â¿Â½ weary traveling they reached a settlement and finally their
homes. It is not probable that Lewis subsequently rendered other military
services during the Indian troubles. In March, 1793, he came west of the
Allegheny, made an extensive examination of the timber-land in what is now
East Franklin township, especially near that part of Ă¯Â¿Â½Hop YardĂ¯Â¿Â½ now owned
by John Brown, and slept, one night, under a white oak which stood west of the
present Kittanning and Butler turnpike road, with a rock for his pillow; but
not liking what he deemed the scantiness of timber, he traveled northward and
selected the tract afterward called Ă¯Â¿Â½Lewisburgh.Ă¯Â¿Â½ He was very active until
his death, which occurred in April, 1850, aged 95 years and 2 months, not long
before which the writer saw him at Kittanning, looking quite hale and hearty.

Adjoining the above-mentioned John Crawford tract on the south and the
David Henry one on the west, is one, a rectangular parallelogram, length-wise
from north to south, but partly defined on the Gapen map, but having the name
of John Craig inscribed on it, but which was settled by Philip Templeton in
March, 1796, to whom it was surveyed as containing 391 acres and 100 perches
by Ross, deputy surveyor, April 23, 1802, and to whom the patent was granted
January 30, 1805, in which year he was assessed with this tract, 2 horses and
5 cattle at $258, and the next year with an additional cow at $264. He erected
his dwelling-house on the eastern part of the tract, where he resided when he
was elected county commissioner in 1818, and until his death, which occurred
January 28, 1826. By his will, dated October 24, 1825, and registered February
20, then next, he devised the half of the tract on which he then lived to his
wife until the arrival of his son Philip at the age of 21 years, directing the
tract to be divided by a straight line, beginning at the Patrick GrahamĂ¯Â¿Â½s
line; thence to the big road; thence to the foot of a ten-acre field; thence
to where the line crossed, and thence straight to the Crawford line. The
eastern half he devised to his son Philip, but if he should die without legal
heirs as he did, September, 1876, he directed to be sold and the proceeds to
be equally divided between his sons and daughters. To his son John he devised
the western part on which the new house was, but if he should die without
lawful heirs, as he did not, he directed it to be sold and the proceeds to be
divided as in the other case. John conveyed his purpart, 194 acres and 80
perches, to his brother Philip, who had been a successful merchant, May 18,
1864, for $4,000, and removed to Illinois where he afterward died, and which
Philip conveyed to the present owner, William Richardson, August 19, 1865, for
$5,400.

Adjoining the Templeton tract on the south is, on the Gapen map, a nearly
square one, surveyed by Gapen, deputy surveyor, to Patrick Harvey, as
containing 402 acres, the central part being traversed southwardly by Long
run, and a southern strip of which is in what is now East Franklin township.
The records do not show to whom Harvey conveyed his interest. This entire
tract was surveyed as containing 394 acres and 148 perches to John Johnston by
Ross, deputy surveyor, March 6, 1805, against whom Absalom Woodward had a
judgement for Ă¯Â¿Â½69 14s 7d debt, 9d costs on transcripts, and 3s 9d Ă¯Â¿Â½damages
by occasion of detention of debt.Ă¯Â¿Â½ By virtue of an execution on that
judgement, Jonathan King, sheriff, sold JohnstonĂ¯Â¿Â½s interest in 250 acres of
this tract to Woodward for $120, and which he conveyed, October 14, 1811,
which the later conveyed to Philip Templeton, December 17, for Ă¯Â¿Â½a stud horse
and $50,Ă¯Â¿Â½ and which he conveyed to David Johnston, August 25, 1812, for
$225. The records do not show when and for what consideration the latter
conveyed this parcel to Patrick Graham. David Johnston obtained a patent for
153 acres and 60 perches of the eastern part of it, February 4, 1815, and
conveyed 101 acres and 140 perches of the southern part to Rev. John Dickey,
December 6, for $335, to whose estate most of it still belongs.* Johnston
conveyed 51 acres and 80 perches of the northern part to John P. Quigley,
December 20, 1815, for $100, which the latter conveyed to James C. Porterfield,
March 14, 1816, for $160, 50 acres of which he agreed to sell to Samuel
Swartzlander, August 31, 1837, for $300, on which he soon after erected his
blacksmith shop. Patrick Graham was first assessed with the other part of it,
250 acres, 1 horse and 2 cows in 1818 at $157. By his will, dated May 22, and
registered May 31, 1831, he did not devise it, but his widow, Margaret Graham,
by her will, dated May 8, 1833, and registered January 24, 1838, devised 50
acres to her son-in-law, Edward McKinney, and 150 acres to her daughter Polly,
with 125 acres of which Leander and William Graham are assessed in 1876 at
$1,750.

Adjoining that Harvey-Graham-Johnston tract on the west is a rectangular
hexagonal one, surveyed by Gapen, deputy surveyor, as containing 421 acres to
Nathan Williams, on which Robert Nelson, blacksmith, was an early settler,
with 400 acres of which, 1 horse and 2 cows he was assessed in 1805, at $155,
and in 1807 with the addition of 1 more cow and a yoke of oxen at $186. By his
will, made in 1826, and registered December 20, 1827, he devised this tract,
his title to which he had acquired by improvement and settlement, to his
niece, Sarah Nelson, who was wooed and won by William Campbell, to whom she
conveyed it, February 20, 1827, for $5, and in consideration of the
solemnization of their marriage, which by their mutual agreement was soon to
occur, with which he and his son John are still assessed-in 1876, at $4,400.

Adjoining the Nelson-Campbell tract on the south is one, a rectangular
parallelogram, surveyed by Gapen, deputy surveyor, to Joseph Irwin as
containing 396 acres and 18 perches, who perhaps conveyed his interest to
McCall. James and William Blain made an improvement and settlement on it in
August, 1797, and to whom it was surveyed by Ross, deputy surveyor, as
containing 410 acres and 20 perches, November 17, 1803. The whole of the Blain
interest seems to have become vested in James, for McCall, to whom the patent
was granted October 2, 1828, conveyed 200 acres to him, June 22, 1829, for $1,
and Blain by his will, dated March 27, and registered December 6, 1815,
devised his purpart equally to his sons, James, John and William. The two
last-named conveyed their interests to their brother James, March 3, 1839, for
$150 each.

Adjoining the western part of that Irwin-McCall-Blain tract on the north
and Ă¯Â¿Â½LewisburghĂ¯Â¿Â½ on the west, its northern boundary being the dividing
line between the depreciation and donation lands, is an incompletely defined
one, nearly a rectangular parallelogram, on the Gapen map, to which on it
Edward McKee appears to have had a claim. John Davis had a subsequent interest
in it, against whom Thomas Collins had a judgement for $300 of debt, and $5.20
of costs. By virtue of a vend. ex. Thereon, Alexander Johnston, sheriff of
Westmoreland county, sold it to Nicholas Day as containing 200 acres more or
less, for $403, and conveyed it to him June 30, 1808, which the latter
conveyed to James Fulton, October 31, for $500. On the other map it appears as
belonging to FultonĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs, to whom it still chiefly belongs, and as
containing 182 acres. Nicholas Snow was first assessed as a blacksmith on this
tract, in 1810, who is said to have been the first one within the present
limits of Sugar Creek township.

Adjoining the northern part of the Fulton tract on the west and lengthwise
along the depreciation and donation line on the north is one on the Gapen map,
a rectangular parallelogram, on which is inscribed the name of Ă¯Â¿Â½John
Denniston,Ă¯Â¿Â½ a part of which became vested in John Brown, thus: The patent
for it was granted to Charles Campbell and Elisha Wick. Campbell and Denniston,
before the latterĂ¯Â¿Â½s death, became Ă¯Â¿Â½jointly and severally seized of 250
acresĂ¯Â¿Â½ of it. They entered into and agreement, February 7, 1804, with Brown,
who then resided at Salem, Westmoreland county, to sell those 250 acres on
which Wick then resided, at 19 shillings an acre. Brown paid the latter in his
lifetime $353.14. But the deed not having been executed before his death, the
agreement having been proven as provided by the act of March 31, 1792, the
court ordered DennistonĂ¯Â¿Â½s administrators to join with Campbell in the
conveyance, which they did, September 21, 1826, in the payment of the balance
of the purchase-money, $512, with which , as containing 250 acres, 2 horses
and 1 cow, he was first assessed, in 1806, at $146, where he resided when he
was commissioned by Governor McKean as a justice of the peace, Ă¯Â¿Â½for district
No. 2, called Buffalo district,Ă¯Â¿Â½ January 1, 1807, and he took his oath of
office February 9. He resided on this tract until his death, which by his
will, dated February 18 and registered September 22, 1835, he devised to his
sons, Matthew and Robert. The latter convened 80 perches on the south side of
his purpart, where a schoolhouse had been erected, to the school directors of
this township, October 31, 1848, for $1. In 1874-5 a new and larger frame
schoolhouse was erected about 125 rods northwesterly from the site of the old
one where Joseph McElroyĂ¯Â¿Â½s blacksmith shop formerly was, at a slight western
bend in the Kittanning and BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend road, on the Robert Brown purpart,
which is adapted to both school and church purposes, and is used for the
latter by the Midway Presbyterian church, which was organized by a committee
of the Kittanning Presbytery, September 4, 1875, with 46 members*, and the
present pastor, Rev. W. J. Wilson**, entered into his pastoral duties April 1,
1876. Members 49; Sabbath-school scholars, 50. John Adams and Daniel Rankin
were the first elders.

_______________________________________________________________________
*The membership has increased to 65. Five adults and fifteen infants have been
baptized.
**Since left.

Adjoining the eastern portion of that Brown tract on the south is an
octagonal one not fully defined on the Gapen map, bearing the name of Ă¯Â¿Â½John
Barron,Ă¯Â¿Â½ but on the other map that of Ă¯Â¿Â½John Orr,Ă¯Â¿Â½ and Ă¯Â¿Â½400a.Ă¯Â¿Â½ What
became of OrrĂ¯Â¿Â½s interest in it is not manifest from the records. Adam Moyers
obtained a patent for about 107 acres of the northern part of it, April 13,
1838, which he conveyed to James Hutchison, who conveyed 66 acres and 128
perches, January 20, 1839, who conveyed 13 acres to Harmon Vasbinder, January
16, 1847, for $65, and 57 acres to Matthew Brown, February 29, 1848, for $400.
A patent for the other portion of it and some vacant land, an irregularly
shaped and comparatively narrow strip or tongue standing from the southwestern
part of the tract beyond the Little Buffalo, aggregating 400 acres and 52
perches, was granted to Elijah Davis, June 28, 1838, surveyed June 3, 1837, in
pursuance of a warrant granted to Thomas Barr, March 5, 1794. Davis conveyed
230 acres and 47 perches to Joseph Blain, September 1, 1848, for $1,100, 10
acres of which Blain conveyed to Thos. H. Foster August 11, 1855, which the
latter conveyed to George Pence, April 3, 1860, for $120. Blain conveyed 145
acres and 103 perches to Foster, June 28, 1838 for $1,747.50. The rest of the
Blain purchase has been subsequently owned by Thomas Patton and D. C. Mobley.
Davis conveyed 150 acres and 80 perches, including the above-mentioned tongue,
and 25 acres and 26 perches of the 150 acres conveyed to McCall to Ebenezer
DavisĂ¯Â¿Â½ executors, August 7, 1828, to which their testator had acquired title
by previous settlement, to John Cowan, June 29, 1852, for $2,400. Ebenezer
Davis was first assessed with a gristmill in 1809, and Elijah Davis with a
sawmill in 1815 and a gristmill in 11817, which were situated on the
northeastern tributary of Little Buffalo, whose head branches rise
respectively in the southwestern part of Ă¯Â¿Â½LewisburgĂ¯Â¿Â½ and the southeastern
of the Brown tract. These mills were rebuilt by Cowan after his purchase from
Davis. Cowan conveyed the two parcels and the mills sold to him by Davis, to
John Burford, April 3, 1856, for $5,000, which the latter conveyed to
Christopher, James and Thomas H. Foster, April 1, 1859, for $4,400, since
known as FosterĂ¯Â¿Â½s mills, which have been remodeled by them, and their store
opened soon after. The postoffice [sic], James Y. Foster, postmaster, was
established here May 5, 1862. About 100 rods northeasterly from the mill is
the site, 80 perches, Ă¯Â¿Â½on the road from William CampbellĂ¯Â¿Â½s to CowanĂ¯Â¿Â½s
mills,Ă¯Â¿Â½ which John Cowan conveyed to the school directors, February 2, 1849,
on which they erected a schoolhouse, which has been recently substituted by a
new one on another site, about 50 rods to the north.

Adjoining the Barron-Orr-Davis-et al. Tract on the south and the
Williams-Nelson-Campbell one on the west is one, a rectangular parallelogram,
on the Gapen map, bearing the name of Ă¯Â¿Â½John Bell, Sr.,Ă¯Â¿Â½ and Ă¯Â¿Â½403a.24,Ă¯Â¿Â½
as surveyed to him by Gapen, deputy surveyor, but on the other map is the name
of Ă¯Â¿Â½Samuel Templeton,Ă¯Â¿Â½ and Ă¯Â¿Â½403a, [sic], about one-sixth of which is in
what is now West Franklin township. Bell probably conveyed his inchoate
interest in it to Alexander Campbell, which the latter transferred to
Archibald McCall in February, 1800, who claimed an undivided interest, to whom
the patent was granted, October 2, 1828. He conveyed 150 acres and 38 perches
to Samuel Templeton, October 24, 1832, for $1 and certain notes and bonds.
Philip Templeton, Sr.,[sic] claimed a part of it as settlerĂ¯Â¿Â½s right. It was
his intention to convey the other portion of it to his son, William, but
inadvertently omitted to do so in his lifetime, and doubts having been likely
to arise as to his intention to make that devise, his other heirs released
their respective interests to William, July 10, 1836, who conveyed it to
McCall, July 15,, for $250, and which was included in his heirsĂ¯Â¿Â½ conveyance
to William F. Johnston, of which he conveyed 20 acres to John Cowan, Sr.,
August 9, 1853, for $300, and 115 acres and 96 perches to Harmon Vasbinder,
October 9, 1886, for $1,600. Twenty acres of this tract having become vested
in James C. Burford, he conveyed the same to Christopher Foster April 1, 1859,
which he conveyed to James and Thomas H. Foster, March 28, 1865 for $220,
being the 20 acres conveyed by Johnston to Cowan. Immediately west of the
last-mentioned tract is a hexagonal one, nearly square, on the Gapen map, with
Ă¯Â¿Â½DanĂ¯Â¿Â½l Morrison, 432 Ă¯Â¿Â½Ă¯Â¿Â½ on its face, and traversed southwesterly by the
Little Buffalo, but on the other map Ă¯Â¿Â½AbĂ¯Â¿Â½m Lennington & A. McCall,
400,Ă¯Â¿Â½ and in the northern part Ă¯Â¿Â½EbenĂ¯Â¿Â½r Davis, 60a.Ă¯Â¿Â½ Lennington and
Davis, May 18, 1809, made this trade: Lennington sold Davis the gristmill
which he had recently erected and 75 acres of land, in consideration of which
Davis sold him his interest in 125 acres of this tract, on which he then
lived, and obtained a clear patent therefor as soon as it could be
conveniently obtained from McCall, and to pay him $400, thus: Ă¯Â¿Â½25 March 1,
1810, in rye, at 3 shillings a bushel; Ă¯Â¿Â½25 in cash, May 1, 1811; Ă¯Â¿Â½16 13s 4d,
March 1, 1812 , in rye, at 3 shillings a bushel, and the last-mentioned
annually thereafter until the whole amount of boot money should be paid.
Lennington agreed to sell 125 acres adjoining Samuel Templeton, April 12,
1817, for $700. The patent was granted to McCall November 22, 1827, and he
conveyed 150 acres to DavisĂ¯Â¿Â½ executors. Davis had agreed in his lifetime to
sell those 125 acres to Jacob Schless, but did not execute a deed. Their
agreement having been duly proven and the court of common pleas of this county
having already judged the same to be sufficient, March 22, 1827, DavisĂ¯Â¿Â½
executors conveyed this parcel to Schless, who conveyed it to Thomas Stewart,
April 1, 1830, for $500. His heirs, after his death, released their interests
in it to Mary Stewart, who conveyed it to Thomas McKee, April 5, 1847, for
$900, which, and seven acres and 98 perches adjoining, he conveyed to his son,
William W. McKee, January 17, 1855, for the last-mentioned amount, and he
conveyed 125 acres to Jehu and John B. Fulton, April 2, 1868, for $3,475, with
which, and 15 more acres, Mrs. Maria Fulton is now assessed. Between this
parcel and the other parcel of this tract, 247 acres and 146 perches, which
was included in the sale by McCallĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs to Johnston, is a narrow strip,
45 acres, belonging to George Elsor, as is seen on J. E. MeredithĂ¯Â¿Â½s
connected draft of several contiguous parcels, and extending a few rods south
into what is now West Franklin township. Elsor also occupied a considerable
portion of this tract west of that strip, and conveyed 225 acres of it to
Benjamin Shaffer, June 28, 1862, for $500, 110 acres of which Shaffer conveyed
to George Forster, November 17, 1875, for $300. ElsorĂ¯Â¿Â½s title to which was
acquired by his Ă¯Â¿Â½living on it for near 30 years,Ă¯Â¿Â½ the southeastern part of
which being in what is now West Franklin township.

Adjoining that Morrison-Davis-Lennington-McCall tract on the north is the
above-mentioned tongue of land included in the patent to Elijah Davis,
immediately north of which on the Gapen map is a partially bounded tract
bearing on its face, Ă¯Â¿Â½AlexĂ¯Â¿Â½r Craig,Ă¯Â¿Â½ but on the other two tracts, one of
which, a pentagon, 112 acres and 13 perches, with the name of Ă¯Â¿Â½R. McDonald,Ă¯Â¿Â½
which was included in the patent granted to Christian Hockey, November 2,
1807, which he and Abraham Hockey conveyed to John Patton, September 5, 1817,
for $100, which Patton conveyed to Robert Orr, Sr., for $300, which he
conveyed to John Orr, September 10, 1817, for $800, who conveyed it to James
Monteith and Philip Templeton, as guardians and executors in trust for the
heirs of McDonald, September 17, for $800. This tract subsequently became
vested in James Monteith, and descended to his daughters Mary and Nancy who,
with their husbands, William F. Johnston and Dr. John Gilpin, conveyed it to
Samuel Dinsmore, April 7, 1840, who conveyed it to Elizabeth Dinsmore,
September 26, 1845, and she to Matthew Wilson, to whose estate it belongs,
March 12, 1856, for $1,905. It looks on the map as if it had been, though it
was not, carved out of the southeastern part of a larger tract adjoining it on
the north and west.

That last-mentioned one, 391Ă¯Â¿Â½ acres, a heptagon, with which John Patton
was first assessed in 1809, at $145, and to whom the patent was granted
February 20, 1810, in the northwestern part of which he built his
mansion-house, where he resided when he was elected county commissioner in
1825, near which he established his tannery in 1824. About one-third of this
tract is west of the Little Buffalo. By his will, dated April 4, and
registered May 8, 1849, he devised to his son James H. a part, including the
tannery and its stock and tools, to his son John the other part of his land
east, except the sawmill which his three sons were to enjoy equally, and to
his son Robert, who was first assessed as a wheelwright in 1826, all west of
Little Buffalo creek.

The third schoolhouse in this township was erected in 1821, near John
PattonĂ¯Â¿Â½s mansion-house, some vestiges of which were recently visible.

Adjoining that Patton tract on the north is an incomplete rectangular
parallelogram, lengthwise east and west, with the name of Ă¯Â¿Â½Wm. Denniston.Ă¯Â¿Â½
On the other map it appears in to purparts, with the name of Ă¯Â¿Â½Thos. Foster,Ă¯Â¿Â½
Ă¯Â¿Â½250a,Ă¯Â¿Â½ [sic] on the eastern, and Ă¯Â¿Â½Jno. Gillespie,Ă¯Â¿Â½ Ă¯Â¿Â½150 a,Ă¯Â¿Â½ the
western part of the entire tract. Foster was assessed with 200 acres, 1 horse,
2 cows, and 1 distillery in 1805, at $157. They probably purchased DennistonĂ¯Â¿Â½s
interest, for the patent was granted to Gillespie, May 12, 1818, and he
conveyed 250 acres of it to foster June 12, for $1. Foster by his will, dated
February 25, and registered December 16, 1839, devised the farm on which he
then lived to his son Thomas H., his son James to have one-half the products
until 21 years old, he to do one-half the work, and to his sons Christopher
and William the farms on which they respectively lived, the three farms to be
valued and made equal. Thos. H. is assessed with 242 acres of this tract in
1876 at $1,356.

The first schoolhouse, a primitive log one, erected in 1812, within the
present limits of Sugar Creek township, was situated on that part of the
Foster Purpart of this tract, near the Painter spring on the farm now owned
and occupied by Thomas H. Foster, the first teacher in which was Hugh Rogers
of Kittanning.

Gillespie by his will, dated April 5, 1850, and registered January 3, 1856,
devised his purpart to his son Henry, who conveyed it thus: 2 acres and 80
perches to I. R. Wick, May 10, 1862, for $75, and 157 acres to William
Devinney, April 6, 1872, for $3,950.

Between the Barron-Orr, the Gillespie-Foster tracts and the division line
between the depreciation and donation lands is one, a rectangular
parallelogram, lengthwise east and west, bearing the name of Ă¯Â¿Â½John DennistonĂ¯Â¿Â½
on the Gapen, but of Ă¯Â¿Â½J. WickĂ¯Â¿Â½ on the other map, on which Elisha and John
Wick appear to have been early settlers. Elisha, Sr. Was assessed with 150
acres, 1 horse and 3 cattle in 1805, at $151, and the next year with an
additional horse and cow at $171. John was assessed in both these years and in
1807 with the same quantity of land, 1 horse and 2 cattle, at $82, after which
his name does not appear on the assessment list.

Elisha Wick, by his will, dated July 17, and registered August 17, 1807,
devised 75 acres of the west end to his son Jeremiah, and the rest, about 220
acres, to his son Elisha, whose heirs released their interests in 99 acres to
Chambers Wick, September 28, 1854, for $100, and in 121 acres to John R. Wick,
January 6, 1855, for the same consideration. Chambers Wick conveyed 99 acres
and 71 perches to Thomas Foster, March 16, 1856, for $2,000.

West of that Wick tract is one partly of the same width, which part is
nearly a rectangular parallelogram, but the other part is a long narrow strip,
extending along line [sic] dividing the depreciation and donation lands,
vacant on the Gapen, but with the name of Reuben Burford on the other map, on
which he probably settled before 1800, for he was assessed with 300 acres, 1
horse and 5 cattle in 1805, at $183, and with 2 cattle less the next year, at
$160. He acquired title thereto by improvement, settlement and residence. By
his will, dated August 12, 1847, and registered October 28, 1852, he directed
his farm on which he then lived to be divided into three parcels, the eastern
one of which he devised to his son Reuben, the western one to his son David,
having previously given the central one to his son George, with which parcels
they are still respectively assessed.

Adjoining the narrow portion of the Burford tract on the south is a
quadrilateral, nearly a triangular one, having two right angles, one acute,
and one obtuse angle, contiguous to which on the southeast is a pentagonal
one, lengthwise from northeast to southwest, having three right and two obtuse
angles, across which on the Gapen map are inscribed, Ă¯Â¿Â½Daniel Brodhead, Esq.
– two tracts.Ă¯Â¿Â½ The records of this county do not show how he disposed of his
interest in them. The former consists , on the other map, of two parcels, the
smaller of which being a quadri but not an equi lateral [sic] one, in the
northwestern part with the inscription, Ă¯Â¿Â½Widow Gallagher, 100a,Ă¯Â¿Â½ and the
larger parcel of similar shape, with the inscription, Ă¯Â¿Â½John Gillespie &
A. McCall, 310a,Ă¯Â¿Â½ the latter of whom probably purchased BrodheadĂ¯Â¿Â½s
interest, and the former was the settler who probably commenced occupying it
about 1797, and was assessed with 400 acres and 1 horse in 1805, at $200, and
the next year with the land only at $100. The first patent was granted to
Gillespie, January 8, 1829, who conveyed 215 acres to McCall, June 20, for 21
[sic], and a second one to McCall, September 9, 1837. Gillespie conveyed the
above-mentioned Ă¯Â¿Â½100aĂ¯Â¿Â½ parcel to Mary Riley, formerly widow Gallagher,
March 23, 1844, which she conveyed to Henry Gallagher the same day for $60, to
whom the heirs of Adam Gallagher released their respective interests, April 9,
for $102.

McCallĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs conveyed 55 acres and 40 perches to Daniel Black, June 29,
1846, for $386, and another portion to William F. Johnston, who conveyed 108
acres and 42 perches to Michael Maley, July 2, 1849, for $920.12, and 100
acres and 94 perches to Patrick Lacey, October 5, 1854, for $995.30.

On the other Brodhead tract is this inscription on the other map, Ă¯Â¿Â½Griffith
& heirs of Quin [sic], 410 Ă¯Â¿Â½a.Ă¯Â¿Â½ The warrant for this tract was granted
to James McCoy, February 3, 1794, and the patent to A. McCall, May 22, 1835.
It was settled and improved by John Griffin, who was first assessed with 300
acres, 1 horse and 2 cows in 1814, at $182. Partition having been made between
him and McCall, the latter conveyed to him 100 acres and 80 perches, June 25,
1837, as settlerĂ¯Â¿Â½s part, who by his will dated February 17, 1840, and
registered June 2, 1842, devised this purpart to his son Andrew, who by his
will dated November 17, 1853, devised to his son John A., which he conveyed to
Theresa and Stephen McCue April 2, 1860, for $1,220. McCallĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs conveyed
169 acres and 48 perches to William B. Clymer, January 20, 1852, which the
latter by A. N. Mylert, his attorney-in-fact, conveyed to Patrick Red,
December 23, 1856, for $1,470.65, in pursuance of an agreement between McCall
and Red, June 1, 1852, with 165 acres of which Red was first assessed in 1843,
He conveyed 70 perches, including the schoolhouse then erected on it, of this
parcel to the school directors of this township, November 24, 1847, for $1.
Red conveyed 164 acres to William Robbett, June 10, 1861, for $3,000.

A. McCall conveyed 100 acres and 30 perches of this tract to John McBride,
October 22, 1841, for $1,000, which he conveyed to John M. Gillespie, March 3,
1871, and which, with other [sic] 3 acres, the latter conveyed to Francis
Miller, April 25, for $3,500.

An early warrant was granted to James Rankin for 385 acres and 86 perches
hereabouts, whose interest therein Nicholas Day, as RankinĂ¯Â¿Â½s legal
representative, conveyed to John Gillespie, February 17, 1813, for $100.
Another somewhat later transaction shows the value of personal property in
early times in this part of Sugar Creek township. Richard Price sold Ă¯Â¿Â½1 mare
and colt, 3 cows, 3 calves, 5 year-old steers, 1 two-year-old heifer, 10
sheep, 4 lambs, 3 beehives, all the grain in the ground (on the land occupied
by Price), oats and flax, all goods and household stuff, and implements of
household and husbandryĂ¯Â¿Â½ to Gillespie, June 25, 1817, for $135.18.

West of the narrow portion of the Reuben Burford tract and of the Broadhead
[sic]-McCall-Gillespie one is vacant land to the county line on the Gapen map,
except narrow strips of the eastern ends of tracts surveyed by Gapen to Ă¯Â¿Â½Peter
Cardan,Ă¯Â¿Â½ Ă¯Â¿Â½Jonathan Craig,Ă¯Â¿Â½ Ă¯Â¿Â½Wm. CraigĂ¯Â¿Â½ and Ă¯Â¿Â½Martha Craig.Ă¯Â¿Â½ on
the other map, in the angle formed by the intersection of the line between the
depreciation and donation lands with the eastern line of the Ă¯Â¿Â½Peter CardanĂ¯Â¿Â½
tract is a nearly square tract, Ă¯Â¿Â½340a.Ă¯Â¿Â½ Was it Ă¯Â¿Â½BurnsĂ¯Â¿Â½ SurplusĂ¯Â¿Â½
mentioned in George and Thomas StewardsonĂ¯Â¿Â½s conveyance of 35 acres to John
Doulatty, October 23, 1863, for $100?

Patrick Boyle settled 150 acres of the vacant land next below or south of
the last above-mentioned tract in 1807, with which he was then assessed at
$22.50, 76 acres and 47 perches of which he conveyed to Hugh Boyle, May 23,
1846, for $214.93.

Adjoining the before-mentioned Broadhead-McCall-McCall-Griffin-Quin tract
on the southeast is an undefined one on the Gapen map, claimed by Ă¯Â¿Â½John
Denniston,Ă¯Â¿Â½ the patent for which, 400 acres, called “Duncannon,”
was granted to Samuel Denniston for himself and in trust for the heirs of John
Denniston, June 25, 1807. The latter had agreed, March 11, 1797, to convey 150
acres of it to Andrew Bullman, part of the tract on which he had made a
settlement, for 1 penny, and making the improvement, settlement, and
continuing the actual residence required by law. The deed not having been made
before John DennisitonĂ¯Â¿Â½s death, the proper court, on due proof of the
performance by Bullman of his part of the agreement, ordered decedentĂ¯Â¿Â½s
[sic] administrator to execute to him a deed for that quantity of land, which
they accordingly did, June 8, 1809. He, by his will, dated July 18, and
registered August 5, 1833, devised his purpart equally to his sons Andrew and
Joseph. The former conveyed his interest to the latter, December 24, 1838, for
$400, 100 acres of which the latter conveyed to Robert Dickey, June 17, 1839,
for $875, who died intestate in 1841, leaving one daughter, whose guardian,
George F. Keener, by order of the orphanĂ¯Â¿Â½s court of this county, sold it to
Connell Boyle and Philip Lowe, on Monday, September 1, 1851, for $1,215, 34
acres and 95 perches of which they conveyed to Daniel Boyle, March 15, 1854,
for $245, on which he opened his store, and 14 acres and 30 perches to Stephen
McCue, the next day, for $125, which he conveyed to his wife, June 29, 1874,
for $1,000, which she had received from the estate of her brother, Michael
Maloney. Boyle and Lowe subsequently made partition, and Lowe released 54
acres and 132 perches to Boyle on the last-mentioned day, which the latter
conveyed to James Forquer, August 13, 1855, which he conveyed to Patrick
McBride, March 12, 1859, for $1,000, and which parcel was included in the 90
acres which McBride conveyed to Martin Wick.

Joseph Bullman continued to occupy the rest of this purpart until shortly
after he was elected register of wills, recorder of deeds and clerk of the
orphansĂ¯Â¿Â½ court of this county in October, 1845. He conveyed 56 acres to
Jacob Hepler, Sr., July 27, 1846, for $675, who by his will, dated June 21,
1859, and registered June 17, 1864, devised it equally to his sons Isaac,
Jacob, Moses, and Tobias, which they conveyed to Archibald Black, December 18,
1866, and which, with other [sic] 12 acres and 88 perches, a part of the
McBride parcel of “Duncannon”, he conveyed to Christopher Malone,
April 17, 1869, for $1,600.

Samuel Denniston and Nicholas Day, administrators, conveyed 250 acres, the
Denniston purpart of “Duncannon”, to Hugh Milligan and Robert
Wallace, September 11, 1811, for $150, the unpaid balance of $500, in
pursuance of an agreement between John Denniston and them, October 21, 1803,
150 acres of which they conveyed to Neil McBride, November 19, 1811, for $560,
who by his will, dated April 30, and registered May 9, 1827, devised this
parcel equally to his sons John and Miles. The latter conveyed 77 acres and
119 perches to the former, May 22, 1847, for $600, who conveyed 24 acres to
Enos McBride, February 1, 1850, for $192, 2 acres and 150 perches to Enos
McBride, January 2, 1858, for $50.

Milligan and Wallace conveyed 100 acres of the eastern part of Ă¯Â¿Â½”Duncannon”Ă¯Â¿Â½
to Robert Boyd, November 19, 1811, for the express consideration of $1, who,
by his will, dated February 16, and registered March 22, 1813, devised this
parcel to his heirs equally, except Elizabeth, after the death of his wife,
whom, and his son John, he appointed his executors. It continued to be
occupied by Mrs. Boyd, to whom it was assessed until 1849, when it was
transferred to Thomas Burns.

It may be remarked in passing that Burns was a stanch opponent of the
county superintendency until the winter of 1859, because he thought the
superintendentĂ¯Â¿Â½s salary was paid out of the school or county tax. Then he
happened to be present when that officer visited the school in the Quinn
schoolhouse, and remarked to another citizen of this township, that if
necessary he would Ă¯Â¿Â½willingly pay a dollar more of tax to keep the
superintendency.

This tract was named after “Duncannon”, a maritime village on
Waterford harbor, in Leinster, county of Wexford, Ireland.

Immediately east of “Duncannon” is vacant land on the Gapen map,
but on the other it appears to have been Abraham HockeyĂ¯Â¿Â½s. He settled on it
quite early, and built a gristmill on a western tributary of Little Buffalo,
it is said, in 1800, with which, 100 acres, 2 horses and 4 cattle he was
assessed in 1805, at $142, and the next year with one cow less, at $136.
Anthony Cravenor having obtained judgement against him for $492.43, exclusive
of costs and interest, a writ of fi. fa. was issued, by virtue of which Jacob
Mechling, sheriff, levied on 110 acres, on which he returned, there appeared
to be Ă¯Â¿Â½no cleared land,Ă¯Â¿Â½ but Ă¯Â¿Â½with a shingle-roofed house, cabin-house
and gristmill thereon erected.Ă¯Â¿Â½ A writ of vend. ex. was issued to No. 86,
December term, 1830, on which it was sold by James Douglass, then sheriff of
this county, to Cravenor, the plaintiff, for $450. This property afterward
became vested – the records do not show how – in Rev. R. P. OĂ¯Â¿Â½Neal, who, by
William Gallagher, his attorney-in-fact, conveying 110 acres to Stephen McCue,
January 20, 1862, for $20. It was occupied several years by Francis OĂ¯Â¿Â½Neal,
noted for his singularities.

The vacant land south of that Hockey-OĂ¯Â¿Â½Neal tract and Ă¯Â¿Â½”Duncannon”Ă¯Â¿Â½
was settled very early by Christian Hockey, to whom 300 acres were assessed in
1805-6, at $140. He was some years afterward assessed with only 100 acres –
the last time in 1827. Peter Hockey was afterward assessed with 30 and John
Hockey with 73 acres, who is still assessed with 75 acres, at $975.

Adjoining the last-mentioned parcel on the east or southeast is vacant land
on which Nathaniel Patterson made an improvement and settlement in or about
1820. (See West Franklin township.)

There is a considerable scope of country west and southwest of
“Duncannon” which appears on both maps to be vacant. It, however,
embraces 97 acres and 35 perches of the Thomas Hindman tract, (See West
Franklin township.) which his sole lineal heir, John Hindman, conveyed to
Daniel Boyle, June 6, 1843, for $900. About 320 acres, perhaps more, were
vacant. Stephen McCue obtained a patent for about 120 acres adjoining
“Duncannon” on the east, which George Smith, sheriff, sold to
Alexander Colwell, on a judgement in favor of William Crow, and conveyed the
same to him December 18, 1844, which Colwell conveyed to McCue, November 20,
1851, for $611, on which he erected his distillery, with which he was first
assessed in 1864. (He conveyed this tract to his son Stephen, June 21, 1877,
for $7,500. )

North of that tract was one of 117 acres, to which Owen Quinn acquired
title by early improvement, settlement and residence, with which and 83 more
acres and 4 cattle he was assessed, in 1805, at $112. Having died intestate
without obtaining a patent, it was granted to his son Henry in trust for OwenĂ¯Â¿Â½s
heirs, September 30, 1847. The interests of the other heirs – Owen left eight
children – were transferred by releases of all but James, who devised his
interest to James McElroy, to Mary Bromfield, James McElroy and Henry Quinn
[sic], who conveyed 39 acres to Stephen McCue, February 15, 1858, for $1,287.
By an amicable partition Mrs. Bromfield became possessed in severalty of 39
acres, which by article of agreement April 4, 1868, she agreed to sell to
William Robbitt [sic] for $1,000, and which she afterward, March 31, 1874,
conveyed to Stephen McCue for $1,000. The claims of these two vendees of
course clashed, which were adjusted by an agreement between them that McCue
should pay Robbitt $950 out of the money he expected to receive from John
Graham, Jr., to whom he had sold this and some other parcels of land, and if
the latter neglected to pay, McCue was to pay Robbitt. Hence arose litigation
on that agreement, namely: Robbitt vs. McCue, No. 292, June tern, 1875, in the
common pleas of this county. (The verdict was rendered March 12, 1877, in
favor of the plaintiff for $1,064.)

McCue conveyed 130 acres and 91 perches, including the last-mentioned
parcel, which he had purchased form Mrs. Bromfield, to John Graham, Jr., April
17, 1875, for $6,000.

ST. PATRICKĂ¯Â¿Â½S CHURCH

The above-mentioned church is located in Sugar Creek township, and its
congregation is composed of people of this and Butler counties. The Catholic
settlers of 1796 mainly located in Butler county. The first priest who visited
the settlement was Father Lanigan, who performed baptisms here in 1801. The
first visit was made by Rev. P. Heilbron, in 1803, who also performed
baptismal services at Sugar Creek and Slippery Rock. In 1805,* Rev. Lawrence
Sylvester Phelau- [sic] also known as Father Whelen or Whalen – came to Sugar
Creek, and located where the church was subsequently built. The Catholic
people were greatly pleased with the thought of having a priest among them,
and, soon after Father PhelanĂ¯Â¿Â½s [sic] arrival, held a meeting to devise
measures for securing him a home and building a church. It was decided to send
men among all the Catholics to solicit donations. The territory to be
canvassed was at least fifteen miles square. Four collectors were chosen and
districts assigned to them as follows: Casper W. Easly took the southern
district, near Slate Lick; James Sheridan the southwestern, or Clearfield
township; Neil Sweeney took Butler and vicinity, and C. Rodgers McCue the
north and northwestern, or Donegal township. These solicitors were successful
in their mission, although they received no subscription larger than the sum
of $2.

The present farm, consisting of nearly 200 acres, was purchased and a small
log cabin was built for the priest. Then, upon a certain day, each of the four
who had solicited subscriptions was required to meet at the farm, bringing
with him as many men as would be required to cut and hew logs enough for one
side of the church. Patrick McElroy was assigned the work of making shingles
and obtaining and driving the nails. The building was erected the fall after
Father PhelanĂ¯Â¿Â½s arrival, but, as nails could not be secured, it was not
roofed until next spring. It was then put under the invocation of the Apostle
of Ireland. The building is still standing. It is 22 V 35 feet, with a gallery
and altar standing against the end wall. Each side contains three small
windows, and each end of the gallery one. This is the oldest Catholic church
now standing in the entire western part of the state. It was attended by
people from all the surrounding country for ten miles or more. People often
walked ten or twelve miles, fasting, to be present at the services. The
stations which the priest was obliged to visit were so numerous, and so far
apart, that mass was not celebrated more than once a month, and, in some
instances, one in two months. There was then but one priest in the whole
district west of the Allegheny river from Erie to Beaver.

Father Phelan withdrew in 1810. From 1810 to 1820 the congregation was
visited occasionally by Fathers OĂ¯Â¿Â½Brien and McGuire, from Pittsburgh, and by
Father McGirr, from SportsmanĂ¯Â¿Â½s Hill. In 1821, Rev. Charles Ferry came to
the church and resided here. He visited all the surrounding district, a
territory at least thirty miles square, which was then estimated to contain
about 140 families. He remained until 1827, when he was succeeded by Rev.
Patrick OĂ¯Â¿Â½Neil, the first resident priest at St, PatrickĂ¯Â¿Â½s, who also
performed missionary work in Butler, Armstrong and adjacent counties. He
remained until 1834, and subsequently was engaged in missionary labors in the
West. He died in 1879, in the 84th year of his age, and the 58th of his
ministry.

In the summer of 1834, Rev. Patrick Rafferty was placed in charge of the
mission and resided at Freeport, visiting St. PatrickĂ¯Â¿Â½s one Sunday in a
month. He remained in charge about two years, then withdrew. He was the pastor
of St. Francis church, Fairmount, Philadelphia, and died in that position in
1863. He was a man of great learning and ability. St. PatrickĂ¯Â¿Â½s remained
without a pastor until the summer of 1837, when Rev. Joseph Cody was appointed
to the pastorate and took up his residence at the church. Mass was celebrated
here two Sundays in the month, the remainder of the pastorĂ¯Â¿Â½s time being
given to Freeport and Butler. By 1840, the congregation had become so large
that a larger church was needed. A brick edifice, 45 V 80 feet, with a
sacristy, a separate building against the rear of the church, was erected. It
was dedicated July 29, 1842, by Very Rev. M. OĂ¯Â¿Â½Connor, V. G. In 1844, the
pastorĂ¯Â¿Â½s field of labor was rendered somewhat smaller by the appointment of
a pastor at Butler, who also had charge of Murrinsville and Mercer. Father
Cody, however, visited BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend occasionally, and a little later
officiated at the newly established church at Donegal (now North Oakland). In
1847, Freeport and BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend were assigned to another priest, and
thenceforth Father Cody gave three-fourths of his time to St. PatrickĂ¯Â¿Â½s and
the remainder to North Oakland. In 1854, the log parsonage was replaced by a
brick residence, After about the year 1861, Father Cody, on account of age and
failing health, ministered only to St. PatrickĂ¯Â¿Â½s congregation. At length he
was obliged to cease from labor, and at the end of the year 1865, Rev. J. O.
G. Scanlan [sic] was transferred from Kittanning to St. PatrickĂ¯Â¿Â½s. Father
Cody soon afterward went to the Mercy hospital, Pittsburgh, where he died
August 7, 1871, in the 70th year of his age. He was buried from St. PatrickĂ¯Â¿Â½s,
and his remains repose in front of the church.

Father Scanlon [sic] set about improving the interior of the church, but
before the work could be accomplished he was transferred to another
congregation, and Rev. James P. Tahany became the pastor in October, 1868. He
collected means and carried out the proposed improvements and the church
became one of the most beautiful in the diocese. In November, 1871, Father
Tahany was succeeded by Rev. S. P. Herman. On the night of January 1, 1872,
the church was destroyed by an incendiary fire. It was a severe loss, as there
was still a small debt and no insurance. The congregation then returned to the
old log church as a place of worship. Rev. Thomas Fitzgerald became pastor and
remained about a year. He was succeeded by Rev. P. M. Doyle, who remained in
charge until the fall of 1875, when he was obliged to retire on account of ill
health. He died in July, 1876, in the 47th year of his age and the 22d [sic]
of his ministry.

On the 9th of January, 1876, Rev. P. J. Quilter became the pastor. He at
once took measures to replace the church which had been destroyed, and
succeeded well. The corner-stone of the structure was laid August 5, 1876,
with ceremonies by the bishop. The church was finished the next summer and
dedicated by Very Rev. R. Phelan, administrator of Allegheny, on the 3d [sic]
of July. The building is of Gothic style, brick, 45 V 90 feet, with a
basement. It is furnished with three altars and beautifully finished. Butts,
of Pittsburgh, was the architect, and William Fiegel, of Butler, contractor.
There was perfect harmony between Father Quilter and all concerned in building
the church. It was only by a great effort that the congregation was able to
erect so large and costly an edifice. The debt is now reduced to $1,800, The
membership is about 100 families at present. Oil developments gave the church
a temporary increase. Millerstown, a new parish, is under the care of St.
PatrickĂ¯Â¿Â½s.

HISTORY OF THE DONATION LANDS

Thus ends the sketch of that part of the present township of Sugar Creek
south of the division line between the depreciation and donation lands.

Before commencing the sketch of its northern half, a brief account of those
donation lands is here requisite. It was enacted by section 5 of the act of
assembly of March 12, 1783, for the purpose of effectually complying with the
letter and intention of their resolve of March 7, 1780, promising to the
officers and privates belonging to this state, in the federal army, certain
donations and quantities of land, according to their several ranks, to be
surveyed and divided off to them severally at the end of the war, a donation
district be appropriated thus: A certain tract of country, beginning at the
mouth of Ă¯Â¿Â½MogulbughtitonĂ¯Â¿Â½ creek (now Mahoning); thence up the Allegheny
river to the mouth of Ă¯Â¿Â½CaguawagaĂ¯Â¿Â½ creek; thence due north to the north
boundary of the state; thence west to the northwest corner of the state;
thence south by the western boundary of the state to the northwest corner of
the depreciation lands, and thence by these lands to the place of beginning;
and was divided into ten districts, which were numbered 1, 2, 3, and so on,
That portion of this county lying between the division line separating the
depreciation and donation lands and a parallel line extending due west from a
short distance below the foot of the bend in the Allegheny river, just above
Hillville, to the Butler county line, constituted the first donation district.
The act of March 12, 1783, further provided that former improvements on these
donation lands should be null and void; that officers and privates entitled to
land should make their applications within two years after peace, which by
subsequent acts was extended, the last limitation ceasing April 1, 1810; and
that they should not sell their shares of land before they were actually
surveyed. By the act of March 16, 1785, such lands were exempted from taxation
during the life of the officer or soldier, unless the same were aliened to
another person or persons. The appointment of deputy surveyors to survey and
lay off in lots the donation lands. [sic] It was provided by the same act,
among other things, that all officers and soldiers of Pennsylvania regiments,
or of independent corps, acknowledged by this state as of its quota in the
Federal army, officers who were citizens of this state when they entered the
service, not attached to the line of any state, who had served therein until
the close of the war; such officers who had been Ă¯Â¿Â½deranged by the
regulations and arrangements of the army according to the act of CongressĂ¯Â¿Â½
of October, 1780, or at any subsequent period of the war; and the widows and
children of those officers and privates who had been slain in battle, or died
in the service, should be entitled to lands according to their pay and rank
just before they left they service, except such rank as was obtained by brevet
unless paid in accordance therewith by the United States; that the lots should
be of four descriptions, one to contain 500 acres each, another 300 acres
each, another 250 acres each, and another 200 acres each, with the usual
allowances; that a quantity equal to what might be necessary for the
major-generals, brigadier-generals, colonels, captains, and two-thirds of the
lieutenant-colonels, should be laid off into lots of 500 acres each; a
quantity equal to what might be necessary for the regimental surgeons and
mates, chaplains, majors and ensigns, into lots of 300 acres each; a quantity
equal to what might be necessary for one-third of the lieutenant-colonels for
the sergeants, sergeant-majors, and quartermaster-sergeants, into lots of 250
acres each; and a quantity equal to what might be necessary for the
lieutenants, corporals, drummers, fifers, drum-majors, fife-majors and
privates, into lots of 200 acres each.

The surveyor-general and each of his deputies were required to be sworn or
affirmed that in laying off those lots he would not select the best land,
either as to quality or situation, to favor anyone of those four classes of
lots to the prejudice or injury of the others, or of this state, and in
running the boundary lines of the lots, each surveyor should cause them to be
well defined, by marking the trees on the lines, at small distances, and
particularly the angles, and on the northwestern corner-tree of each lot
should be marked, in Roman figures, the number of the lot, but if there should
be a post at any such corner, on the tree in the lot nearest to the post. When
all the lots had been laid off, a draft of them should be made, which should
be deposited in rolls-office after all the applications were satisfied. The
supreme executive council was required to cause numbers, corresponding to each
of the four classes, to be made on square pieces of white paper of uniform
size, or as nearly so as might be, and in their presence to roll and bind well
those numbers separately and carefully, with silken thread, as uniformly as
possible, and deposit them in four wheels, Ă¯Â¿Â½like unto lottery wheels,Ă¯Â¿Â½
which, before any applicant should be permitted to draw therefrom, should be
repeatedly Ă¯Â¿Â½well turned round.Ă¯Â¿Â½ Those wheels were to be safely kept and
remain sealed, except when drawn from, under the direction of a committee of
three members of the supreme executive council, who were to judge and
determine on the right of each applicant to receive grants of land, with the
right of appeal in all cases of doubt and difficulty to the supreme executive
council, whose decision thereon was final and conclusive. The successful
applicants were entitled to draw thus: A major-general, 4 tickets from the
wheel containing the numbers on the 500-acre lots; a brigadier-general, 3
tickets; a colonel, 2 tickets; a lieutenant-colonel; 1 from that wheel and 1
from the wheel containing the numbers on the 250-acre lots; a surgeon,
chaplain or major, each 2 tickets from the wheel containing the numbers on the
300-acre lots; a captain, 1 ticket from the wheel containing the numbers on
the 500-acre lots; a lieutenant, 2 tickets from the wheel containing the
numbers on the 200-acre lots; an ensign, or regimental surgeonĂ¯Â¿Â½s mate,
respectively, 1 ticket from the wheel containing the numbers on the 300-acre
lots; a sergeant, sergeant-major or quartermaster-sergeant, respectively, 1
ticket from the wheel containing the numbers on the 250-acre lots; a
drum-major, fife-major, drummer, fifer, corporal or private, respectively, 1
ticket from the wheel containing the numbers on the 200-acre lots. Before the
boundary line between Pennsylvania and New York was definitely established,
some of the donation lots were laid off on territory of the latter state. It
was provided by acts of April 5, 1793, and February 23, 1801, that those who
had drawn lots in that territory should be allowed, under prescribed
regulations, to draw others in lieu of them from the undrawn ones in any of
the donation districts within this state. After April 1, 1810, the undrawn
donation lots reverted to the commonwealth, which were to be disposed of in
such manner as the legislature should thereafter by law direct.

By the act of April 9, 1828, the secretary of the land office was
authorized to extend the provisions of the act to encourage the warranting and
patenting of lands north and west of the Ohio and Allegheny rivers and
Conewango creek, passed March 1, 1811, to the settlers or owners of the
undrawn donation lands.

As the Gapen map of surveys does not extent northwardly beyond the division
line between the depreciation and donation lands, the other
heretofore-mentioned map is the only one representing the early surveys in the
west of Sugar Creek township, on which at the southwestern part of the
donation lands in this township is one, a rectangular parallelogram, 400
acres, for which a warrant was granted to John Cox March 1, 1797, whose
interest was probably purchased by Charles Campbell, to whom the patent was
granted July 28, 1817. Robert McCutcheon settled on it first. He was assessed
with it, with 2 horses and 2 cows, in 1805 and 1806, at $122. There was an
early agreement between him and Campbell that he should have 200 acres and
one-half of the excess of 400 acres that might be in the tract at the
valuation made by two or three respectable freeholders, with such proof of
settlement as would enable Campbell to obtain the patent. McCutcheon conveyed
his interest in the major part on the depreciation and donation line, June 7,
1807. It appears from the map that 150 acres of the northern part were laid
off to McCutcheon, who sold or agreed to sell 50 acres of the northern part to
Dennis Quinn, and agreed to convey the other part, 100 acres, to William D.
McCutcheon, June 15, 1809, for $500 in annual payments. That McCutcheon
purpart, 150 acres, was sold by Robert Robinson, sheriff, on Vend. Ex. No 88,
September term, 1823, in Philip Mechling, late sheriff, vs. Robert and William
D. McCutcheon, to William Ayres and John Bredin for $230, 50 acres of which
they conveyed to Dennis Quinn, February 5, 1842, for $100, having previously
sold to him the other 100 acres, which last-mentioned parcel he conveyed to
John Boyle, January 5, 1846, for $600, with which the latter is assessed in
1876 at $1,400. Quinn appears to have been in possession of the Campbell half
of the excess over 400 acres, which Campbell had sold or agreed to sell to
James Wilson, who instituted an ejectment for it against Quinn to No. 64, June
term, 1843, in the common pleas of this county, which was tried and resulted
in a verdict for Wilson for 48 acres to be released on payment of $140.67, in
twelve months from September 15, 1844, which Wilson conveyed to Quinn, October
2, 1845. Quinn conveyed one-fourth of an acre on the eastern part of his land
to the school directors of this township for school purposes about April 9,
1839, in which is what is known as the Quinn schoolhouse.

Adjoining the Campbell-McCutcheon tract on the north is one of the same
shape, 439 acres and 101 perches, contiguous to which on the north, chiefly in
what is now BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend township, is another, 436 acres and 108 perches,
for both of which patents were granted to Charles Campbell, and the two
together were named Ă¯Â¿Â½Campbelltown,Ă¯Â¿Â½ on which Nicholas Allimong and his
family were early settlers, which Campbell, in AllimongĂ¯Â¿Â½s lifetime, agreed
to convey to him, and which he did convey to his executors, Jacob Allimong and
Jonathan King, in trust for his legatees, August 19, 1809, and those executors
the same day conveyed the southern tract, or southern half of Ă¯Â¿Â½Campbelltown,Ă¯Â¿Â½
and part of the northern thus: 200 acres by King to Jacob Allimong, 100 acres
to Elizabeth Shectley [sic], and 200 acres to Susannah Wiles. Mrs. Wiles, her
husband, [sic] conveyed 118 acres and 158 perches of her purpart to Frederick
Wiles, September 21, 1841, for $400, which he conveyed to William McCrea, May
14, 1842, for $1,250, and 117 acres and 40 perches to Samuel S. Sanderson,
April 16, 1851, for $1,260.43, which by his will, dated January 15, and
registered May 21, 1872, devised to his son James. Mrs. Shectley [sic]
conveyed her purpart to David Sheakley, October 1, 1853, for $850.

There is a narrow strip of the northern tract of Ă¯Â¿Â½CampbelltownĂ¯Â¿Â½ in this
township, on which Harrison Miller resides, being a part of his purchase
elsewhere mentioned, (Vide Brady’s Bend) together with the southern part of
the tract adjoining it on the east.

Jacob Allimong by his will, dated March 15, and registered April 12, 1823,
devised and bequeathed all his property to his wife so long as she retained
his name. He directed his real estate to be sold after her death for the best
price that could be obtained, and the money arising from its sale to be
divided among his son John and the latterĂ¯Â¿Â½s four children, 151 acres of
which Jacob AllimongĂ¯Â¿Â½s grandchildren conveyed to James E. Brown, November 5,
1852, for $45.25, which he conveyed to Samuel Sanderson March 9, 1852, for
$1,510, 15 acres and 74 perches of which Sanderson conveyed to James Patty,
November 6, 1858, for $400, 8 acres and 44 perches of which Patty conveyed to
John McSweeney, and which he conveyed to David Byers, April 4, 1865, for $325.

Adjoining South Ă¯Â¿Â½CampbelltownĂ¯Â¿Â½ on the west is a tract which seems to
have been originally a rectangular parallelogram that contained about 400
acres, the warrant for which was granted to James Buchanan, from the
southeastern part of which a smaller parallelogram appears to have been laid
off to John Boyers, but when it was the records do not show. It was first
settled by Valentine Snyder, probably about 1797 or 1798, with 244 acres of
which and 1 cow he was assessed in 1805-6, at $102.60. He transferred his
interest in it to Samuel Sanderson in 1807, who was then assessed with 369
acres and one cow, at $169.60. This tract afterward was known as the Ă¯Â¿Â½Sanderson
tract.Ă¯Â¿Â½ The indication on the map is, that James Ramsey settled on it, who
was first assessed in Sugar Creek township in 1809. The inchoate title to this
tract became vested in Charles Campbell. James CampbellĂ¯Â¿Â½s executors obtained
a judgement against his executors for $3,436.95 debt, and for $3.50 costs, on
which a writ of Vend. Ex. Was issued by virtue of which Jacob Mechling sold it
and several other tracts to Daniel Stannard, of the borough of Indiana, and
conveyed it and them to him, December 7, 1828, for $780. It was included among
the three tracts which James Campbell agreed to convey to Dr. John Gilpin,
December 12, 1838, and which three tracts Stannard, by CampbellĂ¯Â¿Â½s direction,
conveyed to Gilpin, January 29, 1840, for $4,650, the patent having been
granted to the latter for 383 acres and 56 perches, January 9, 1839, which he
conveyed thus: 2 acres to Peter Keemeser [sic] and Henry Wiles, April 9, 1840,
for $40; 17 acres and 112 perches to William Morgan, August 9, 1847, for $255;
and 100 acres and 1 perch to Thomas Rockett, January 30, 1848, for $2,400; 54
acres and 64 perches to William Reese, March 22, 1852, for $800; 19 acres and
120 perches to Catherine Byers, May 12, 1862, for $439.75; 126 acres and 32
perches, reserving 2 acres above mentioned, Ă¯Â¿Â½sold to and occupied by a
German churchyard and burial-place,Ă¯Â¿Â½ to Henry Bol., May 30, 1866, for
$3,786, 28 perches of which he conveyed to Jacob Ellenberger, David L. and
William Kemerer [sic], David King, William Millison, David Sheakley, and
George Vensel and their successors, consisting of St. PaulĂ¯Â¿Â½s Reformed church
in the United States, August 19, 1871, for $25, and 126 acres and 32 perches
with the reservation of the 2-acre church lot, 20 acres theretofore sold to
Thomas W. George and the privilege of the spring of water southeast from the
church edifice which had been granted by Bolz to St. PaulĂ¯Â¿Â½s church, leaving
106 acres to Michael Myers, May 14, 1873, for $13,500.

About 1835 Rev. Sweitzerbort of Butler county commenced holding religious
services among the Lutherans, who had settled here and hereabout [sic], and
were members of the White church in that county, preaching at first to
congregations in private houses, barns and the grove, which resulted in the
organization of the Evangelical Lutheran church of Sugar Creek township. In
the course of about four years the congregation erected a church edifice,
frame, and about 40 Ă¯Â¿Â½ 50 feet, hight [sic] of ceiling 12 feet, which had not
been completed and furnished when it was broken down by the weight of the
heavy snow on New YearĂ¯Â¿Â½s night, 1840. Its site was on the above-mentioned
two-acre parcel, the legal title to which being in Henry Wiles and Peter
Kemerer, they conveyed it to John Ellenberger, Joseph King, John Marchand,
David Snyder and Barnhart Vensel, trustees of the Evangelical Lutheran church,
and John Boyers, Adam and Daniel Kemerer, John Millison and Frederick Wiles,
Jr., trustees of the Presbyterian (?) Church of Sugar Creek township, and
their successors, April 20, 1841, for $40, the St. PaulĂ¯Â¿Â½s having been
organized about that time with Rev. Mr. Dale as pastor, and soon after erected
their present church edifice, frame, 34 Ă¯Â¿Â½ 50 feet, hight [sic] of ceiling 16
feet, substantially built and painted white and neatly furnished. The next
pastor was Rev. J. W. Alspach, who and several members of the church presented
to the court of common pleas of this county a bill in equity, praying that the
deed from Kemmerer and Wiles to the trustees of both the last-mentioned
congregations might be reformed by striking out the word Ă¯Â¿Â½PresbyterianĂ¯Â¿Â½
wherever it occurred [sic] in the deed, and inserting in lieu thereof the word
Ă¯Â¿Â½Reformed.Ă¯Â¿Â½ It having been duly proven that the former had by mistake been
inserted instead of the latter, the court ordered and decreed, December 22,
that the mistake be corrected as prayed for. The membership of this church is
quite large, probably exceeding 150 members, with a Sabbath school of about
100 scholars. The writer regrets that he has not been able to obtain from the
records of these churches more detailed statements of facts.

The above-mentioned 100-acre tract, which appears to have been surveyed off
the Ă¯Â¿Â½Sanderson Tract,Ă¯Â¿Â½ was settled by John Boyers – spelled Buyers for a
few years on the assessment-list – in 1810, when he was first assessed with
100 acres at $100, to whom the patent was granted, May 5, 1818, which he
conveyed to David Boyers, February 17, 1849, with certain reservations during
his and his wifeĂ¯Â¿Â½s lives, on condition and in consideration of the granteeĂ¯Â¿Â½s
paying him annually certain quantities of grain and provisions, and which, as
containing 113 acres and 84 perches, strict measure, he conveyed to Thomas
Foster, Jr., February 27, 1868, for $4,600.

Contiguous to those Boyers and Sanderson tracts on the south is one, a
rectangular parallelogram, 413 acres, 46 perches, adjoining the division line
between depreciation and donation lands on the south, early settled by Josiah
White, to whom the warrant was granted April 19, 1804, surveyed January 29,
1805, and the patent was issued to him March 25, 1818. He was assessed with
200 acres and 1 horse in 1805 and 1806, at $110. He conveyed 219 acres and 49
perches of the northern part to Daniel B. Heiner and John Mechling, March 7,
1839, for $3,000, which they conveyed to James Wilson, April 1, 1840, for
$4,400. He, by his will dated November 19, 1870, and registered February 22,
1871, devised it to his wife during her life, and directed it to be sold as
soon as convenient after her death, and the proceeds of the sale to be divided
among his children, so that each oneĂ¯Â¿Â½s share after deducting his or her
bequest be equal.

White conveyed 207 acres of the southern part to Andrew Schriver, April 7,
1845, for $1,700, who conveyed 50 acres and 12 perches to John McLaughlin,
April 1, 1848, for $500; 105 acres to Thomas P. Jenkins, April 1, 1859, for
$1,700, and 52 acres to David Bish, June 7, 1847, for $500, which the latter
conveyed to John McLaughlin, April 4, 1857, for $714.

Adjoining the White tract on the east is one of the same shape and area,
bounded by the division line between depreciation and donation lands on the
south, the warrant for which was granted to John Chambers March 1, 1794, who
probably conveyed his interest in it to Robert Cathcart, and he to Leonard
Trees, who seems to have been the first settler. He was assessed with 100
acres, 1 horse and 3 cows, in 1805, and the next year with an additional head
of cattle, at $126. The patent was granted to him January 24, 1809. He and his
stepson, Charles Ellenberger, entered into a written agreement September 17,
1808, by which he agreed to sell Ellenberger the southern part of this tract,
including the orchard, upland, meadow and pasture, and all his live stock,
excepting a piece of meadow near the house and some of the live stock, in
consideration of which Ellenberger agreed to pay Cathcart what was due on the
land, all of TreesĂ¯Â¿Â½ debts, and deliver to him annually certain quantities of
grain, provisions, and , if required, Ă¯Â¿Â½ten gallons of good whisky [sic],Ă¯Â¿Â½
and do certain work in case of TreesĂ¯Â¿Â½ inability to do it. Thus continued
that domestic arrangement respecting that portion of this tract until August
12, 1812, when Trees conveyed 100 acres to Ellenberger for $100, and 89 acres
and 60 perches to Peter Hummon for $89. Ellenberger, by agreement, October 22,
1847, conveyed 200 acres to Tobias Hepler, in consideration of maintenance,
etc., which the latter conveyed to Charles Seckler, April 15, 1869, for
$6,500, which he conveyed to Joseph McElroy, May 15, 1874, for $10,500. Hummon
having removed to Crawford county, Ohio, by William Green, his
attorney-in-fact, conveyed his parcel to William Devinney, January 18, 1833,
for $700, 14 acres and 38 perches of which he conveyed to Dr. Samuel S.
Wallace, September 7, for $81.87, who was the first resident physician within
the present limits of Sugar Creek township, and as such was first assessed in
1827. The site of one of the public schoolhouses, called the Ă¯Â¿Â½Wallace
schoolhouse,Ă¯Â¿Â½ was on the eastern part of this parcel. It appeared like quite
and old building in 1855. An affluent farmer of this township accompanied the
county superintendent in his visit to the school in that house, in the winter
of 1860, during which it so happened that an arithmetical class recited. That
officer, in the course of his questions and explanations, so elucidated some
of the principles on which the rules of arithmetic are founded as on another
occasion to elicit from that farmer the remark, “That even if the salary
of the superintendent were paid by the people of the county, he had learned
enough while in the school with the superintendent to pay him for what would
be his share of it.”

 

Adjoining that Trees-Ellenberger tract on the north was a 400-acre one, the
inchoate title to which became vested in Nicholas Day, who agreed to convey it
to Joseph Wiles, July 16, 1796, for Ă¯Â¿Â½130, to be paid in installments, and
obtain a patent to him Ă¯Â¿Â½clear of all incumbrance,: which was granted to him
Jule 27, 1818, 50 acres of which he conveyed to Peter Hummon, March 1, 1819,
for $400, which the latter, with the 89 acres and 60 perches he had purchased
from Trees, conveyed to William Devinney, January 18, 1833, for $700, 14 acres
and 38 perches of which the latter conveyed to Dr, Samuel S. Wallace,
September 7, for $81.87.

By the act of April 11, 1806, Joseph (written Jost) WilesĂ¯Â¿Â½ house was
designated as the place for holding elections in old Sugar Creek township. The
portion of this tract which Joseph died seized descended to his son, Henry, at
whose house the elections continued to be held until after the organization of
BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend township, where, says one of the writerĂ¯Â¿Â½s correspondents,
there was generally Ă¯Â¿Â½plenty of PaddyĂ¯Â¿Â½s eye-water,Ă¯Â¿Â½ meaning Patrick ReedĂ¯Â¿Â½s
whisky [sic], – and one or more fisticuffs before the voters left the
election-ground.

A call was issued August 19, 1829, Ă¯Â¿Â½for a meeting at Henry WilesĂ¯Â¿Â½, on
Tuesday, September 1, to deliberate and advise, but not to dictate to the
people, as the opinion was entertained, that there was too much intrigue and
mystery involved in the management of political business in both state and
county,Ă¯Â¿Â½ and requested the people of other townships to do so. That meeting
was held, of which John Brown was chairman, and James Adams secretary, and
resolutions were adopted in accord with the spirit of the call.

Henry Wiles conveyed 53 acres and 80 perches of this tract to Solomon
Rumbaugh, January 3, 1850, for $1,000, and by his will, dated October 26,
1852, and registered May 27, 1854, he devised 68 acres and 89 perches to his
son-in-law, David King, and 30 acres, on which the testator then resided, to
his daughter Catherine. The 50 acres which he had in his lifetime surveyed to
John F. Wiles, the latterĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs conveyed to Jabez Griffith September 26,
1874, for $10.

Adjoining the Joseph Wiles tract on the north was another similar one, a
considerable portion of it being in what is now BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend township, for
which a warrant was granted to Samuel Buchanan, James C. Campbell and William
McCoy, February 3, 1794, to whom it was surveyed April 19, 1795, on which John
Wiles settled and made improvement in November, 1796, to whom it was surveyed
by Ross, deputy surveyor, December 18, 1801, and was one of the tracts sold by
Presley C. Lane, United States marshal of the western district of
Pennsylvania, and conveyed by him to Thomas Stewardson, May 19, 1802, who
conveyed it and three other similar tracts to Charles Campbell, February 23,
1807, for $398,14. John Wiles was the earliest permanent settler on this
tract, with 400 acres of which, 1 horse and 3 cattle he was assessed in 1805,
at $196, and which Campbell conveyed to him, March 14, 1818, for $280, to whom
the patent was granted January 18, 1819. It appears on the map to have been
divided by Wiles into five parcels, rectangular parallelograms, the two
southern ones lengthwise east and west, 100 acres, and bearing his own name,
and the other three lengthwise from north to south, the eastern one, 127
acres, bearing the name of Peter Wiles, the central one of the same area
bearing the name of Jacob Wiles, and the western one, 50 acres, bearing the
name of Benjamin Swaim, the major portion of all three being in what is now
BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend township. John Wiles conveyed 260 acres, mostly in what is now
Sugar Creek township, to John Crawford, May 8, 1820, for $549, which the
latter conveyed to Jonathan Mutimore, January 10, 1832, for $1,000. One
hundred and forty-one acres and 40 perches of the Sugar Creek portion of this
parcel became vested in David Boyers, which he conveyed to Samuel Sanderson –
the last two conveyances are not on record – which he conveyed to Thomas F.
Toule, August 30, 1849, for $2,030, and which the latter conveyed to William
D. Watkins, April 27, 1860, for $3,300. The latter, by his will, dated May 14,
and registered September 9, 1873, devised and bequeathed all his property to
his wife and authorized her to sell it, and is she should marry, the property
and its effects to be divided equally among his children.

Adjoining the John Wiles tract on the east is one similar in shape and
area, 421 acres and 92 perches, the warrant for which was granted to William
McCoy, February 3, 1794, to whom it was surveyed April 19, 1795, and on which
Conrad Moyers made a settlement and improvement, June 22, 1796, to whom it was
surveyed by Ross, deputy surveyor, April 30, 1802. The northern half, or about
that quantity, is in what is now BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend township. Moyer was assessed
with 400 acres if it and 1 cow in 1805, at $166, and afterward with 200 acres
until 1808, when it was transferred to John Pontius. Samuel and William
Crawford subsequently obtained all the interests in this tract, to whom the
patent was granted January 9, 1839. They, having laid the northern part of it
off into small lots or parcels, conveyed the whole tract, 425 acres and 12
perches to William F. Johnston, May 16, 1840, for $1,675. The records show
conveyance from him to divers persons of about 205 acres, in lots and parts of
lots and parcels, the largest one not exceeding 51 acres, from November 19,
1847, to June 16, 1865, for $4,608.05. The largest number of conveyances on
any one day were made August 31, 1854. The town or hamlet of Greenville is
situated on this tract along the Kittanning and BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend road.

Adjoining that McCoy-Moyer tract on the south is one like it, for which the
warrant was granted to Thomas Buchanan, February 3. 1794, on which it was
surveyed to him April 19, 1795. And on which Adam Moyer made an improvement in
April, and a settlement, June 23, 1796. Buchanan having leased it to another
party who attempted to obtain possession, a surveyor was employed, either by
Buchanan or his lessee, to trace the lines, June 1, 1797. Moyer threatened
that he would cripple him if he did not desist, and, with a gun in his hand
which he cocked, declared that he would shoot any one who would attempt to
settle on this tract. Several persons were thus intimidated from going on this
land to make a settlement. Ross, deputy surveyor, surveyed this tract as
containing 437 acres and 24 perched to Adam Moyer, April 30, 1802. BuchananĂ¯Â¿Â½s
lessee brought an ejectment suit against Moyer for the 400 acres of this land,
then in Buffalo township, to Armstrong county, but still within the
jurisdiction of Westmoreland county, November, 1803. The case was tried before
Smith and Yeates, justices of the supreme court, who charged the jury that,
there having been no actual settlement anterior to the plaintiffĂ¯Â¿Â½s survey,
the plaintiffĂ¯Â¿Â½s title must prevail unless it had been avoided by his
non-performance of the conditions of settlement and improvement. But, they
asked, who prevented that performance? Who expected to derive a benefit from
that improper conduct? The defendant. If they counted the period from which
the settlement was to commence, from December 22, 1793, the ratification of
the treaty at Fort Greenville, the defendant had, within the time allowed for
making the settlement, obstructed the plaintiff or his agents from complying
with the law, and, according to all their decisions, should reap no advantage
therefrom, and, if the case were even dubious, the defendantĂ¯Â¿Â½s lawless
conduct should postpone him, on principles of general policy and safety.
Verdict for the plaintiff in stanter. (See that case reported in Vol. II of
Laws of Pennsylvania, ed. 1810, p. 224.)

Moyer remained in possession and was assessed with 400 acres and 5 cattle
in 1805 and 1806, at $198, to whom, before his death, Charles Campbell had
agreed to convey whatever title he had acquired, which he did to George Moyer
in trust for Adam MoyerĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs, June 22, 1813 for $700, to whom the patent
was granted March 15, 1816, Thomas Buchanan conveyed whatever interest he had
therein to Philip Moyer, September 28, 1839. Adam Moyer, by his will, dated
March 27, and registered June 16, 1812, devised Ă¯Â¿Â½the old place of 200 acresĂ¯Â¿Â½
to his sons George and Philip, they to pat the legatees at the rate of $3.50
per acre, and to keep their mother the rest of her life, unless she should
remarry. He directed that if Gen, Campbell should not make a title for the
land they should make it themselves, and keep the expense out of the price of
the land, either in two years after their motherĂ¯Â¿Â½s death or in two years
after they should obtain title; and that they should take a fatherly care of
the little boys, clothe and school them until they should be sixteen years
old, who should ne obedient to them, and then Ă¯Â¿Â½go to trades.Ă¯Â¿Â½ So it
continued to be occupied by these heirs until they sold it to others. George
and Philip Moyer conveyed 200 acres of the southern part to David Rumbaugh,
September 19, 1816, for $1, 300, who soon erected thereon a large two-story
house, which he weatherboarded, and a capacious barn, which were then the best
buildings in that neighborhood. He had the likeness of a clock painted on the
gable end of his house next to the public road, being what is now the
Kittanning and BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend one, the hands representing the time to be 11:45
oĂ¯Â¿Â½clock, and he was occasionally amused by travelers comparing the time
indicated by their watches with and setting them by it. He agreed, April 14,
1841, to convey the 200 acres to his son Solomon, in consideration of the
proper maintenance of him and his wife during the rest of their lives, which
agreement must have been complied with, for the latter conveyed 212 acres to
James A. Adams and William Varnum, April 2, 1856, for $5,500, 200 acres being
assessed to Adams in 1876 at $3,000, having previously conveyed 1 acres and 26
perches to Dr. Wallace.

George and Philip Moyer conveyed, October 16, 1839, 115 acres and 30
perches of the northern part or Ă¯Â¿Â½old place,Ă¯Â¿Â½ to William Hart for $1,380,
and 34 acres and 26 perches to John Marchand for $155. Frederick Moyer
conveyed 131 acres, which had become vested in him, reserving one acre for his
own use, and the use of the spring, to Jacob Ellenberger, December 8, 1855,
for a comfortable maintenance.

Next south of that Ă¯Â¿Â½disputed territoryĂ¯Â¿Â½ is a tract, a rectangular
parallelogram, lengthwise east and west, 130 acres, on which is the name of
Henry Moore, to whom the warrant was probably granted, and to whose heirs it
was assessed in the unseated list in 1812, and for a few years thereafter. It
appears to heave been subsequently occupied by James Adams, who was first
assessed with 50 acres unseated in 1825, having previously purchased about
that quantity from the next herein-after-mentioned tract. He was first
assessed with 170 acres of seated land in this township in 1828, The interest
of MooreĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs having become vested in him, he obtained a warrant for at
least the greater part of this tract March 27, 1837, and the patent June 2,
1840, a portion of which he conveyed to Chambers and Robert Orr, and 35 acres
and 49 perches of which he conveyed to William Cowan, October 8, 1841, for $1,
which the latter conveyed to Dr. Samuel S. Wallace, the same day, for $215,
which, with the 14 acres and 38 perched which the doctor had purchased from
Devinney, and the 1 acre and 26 perched which he had purchased from Rumbaugh,
Dr. WallaceĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs conveyed to Andrew McElroy, April 1, 1873, for $4,500.

James Adams was first assessed in this township as a single man, and with 1
horse, in 1815, at $20, and the next year as a Ă¯Â¿Â½storekeeper,Ă¯Â¿Â½ the first
one in this township, and 1 horse, at $50. His store, it is said, was at first
kept in the loft of a springhouse [sic] on an adjoining tract, but was
afterward removed to the southern part of this Moore-Adams tract, which point
has been for many years know as Ă¯Â¿Â½Adams.Ă¯Â¿Â½ Hay scales, not common in rural
districts, were erected here soon after the Great Western or BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend
iron-works went into operation, and proved to be very convenient to the
farmers of this section, who sold their hay and other products at these works.
The postoffice was established here September 23, 1853, James Adams
postmaster. This property still belongs to the Adams estate.

Next south of the Moore-Adams tract is a square one, 300 acres, on which
Robert Orr, Sr., settled, and with 197 acres, 1 horse and 5 cattle, he was
assessed in 1805 and 1806 at $146.80. The patent for the entire tract was
granted to him February 16, 1815; 140 or more acres of the northern part he
conveyed to John Conly [sic] July 4, 1816, who conveyed 100 acres, including
the orchard and meadow, to William Brownfield, May 20, 1821, for his proper
maintenance with and annual supply of Ă¯Â¿Â½ten gallons of good whisky [sic], if
required.Ă¯Â¿Â½ Conly [sic] also conveyed 50 acres and 62 perches, in three
separate parcels, to James Adams, July 25, 1822, for $158, in whom the
Brownfield parcel subsequently became vested.

Robert Orr, Sr.,[sic] continued in the occupancy of the southern half of
this tract until he leased it to Solomon Rumbaugh about 1825, about which time
he removed to Kittanning. He conveyed this parcel to his sons, Chambers and
Robert, May 7, 1831. He died at Kittanning, September 4, 1833, in his 89th
year.

Robert Orr, Sr., [sic] was a native of the county of Derry, Ireland, whence
he emigrated to this country in 1766, resided in what is now Mifflin county,
where he married Miss Culbertson, until 1773, when he and his wife removed to
Hannastown, Westmoreland county, Pennsylvania, where he resided until he
settled in what is now this township. He espoused the colonial cause on the
adoption of the declaration of independence, and was an earnest, active and
devoted patriot, and readily volunteered his services and encouraged others to
volunteer theirs, when needed, to protect the western frontier from the Indian
incursions and attacks. Gen. George R. Clark, of Virginia, having communicated
to Archibald Lochery, the lieutenant of Westmoreland county, Pennsylvania, his
determination to enter upon a campaign against the Indians down the Ohio
river, in the summer of 1781, and having requested him to raise 100 volunteers
and a company of cavalry in his county, and Lochery having intimated the same
to Orr, the latter promptly raised a company of volunteer riflemen and
furnished such of its members as were unable to furnish themselves with
necessaries for that expedition, chiefly at his own expense, as he could not
order the company of militia, of which he was captain, from home. The force
consisted of two companies of rangers, commanded respectively, by Captains
Shannon and Stokeley, and a company of horse, commanded by Captain Campbell,
aggregating about 125 men, who rendezvoused at CarnahanĂ¯Â¿Â½s blockhouse, eleven
miles west of Hannastown, July 24, and moved the next day, via Pittsburgh, for
Fort Henry, where Wheeling now is, where, according to a prearrangement, they
were to join ClarkĂ¯Â¿Â½s army, which, they ascertained on their arrival, had
advanced twelve miles down the river, having left some provisions and a boat
for them. With an inadequate supply of ammunition and provisions, they
proceeded down the river, expecting to meet Clark at the mouth of the Kanawha,
but were again disappointed, as he was obliged to move his force before their
arrival to prevent desertion. Their provisions and forage being nearly
exhausted, there being no other source of supply than from what Clark had, and
the stage of water in the river being low, Lochery, who was the only field
officer in command, dispatched Captain Shannon with four men in a small boat,
hoping that they might overtake the main army and secure supplies, who were
soon captured by the Indians, together with letter to Clark, disclosing the
destitute condition of LocheryĂ¯Â¿Â½s force, from which, and the accounts given
by the nineteen deserters from ClarkĂ¯Â¿Â½s army, whom Lochery had arrested, and
who, on being released, joined the Indians, they thus learned that Clark and
Lochery were not together, and ceasing to be awed by ClarkĂ¯Â¿Â½s artillery, they
collected in force below the mouth of the Great Miami and placed their
prisoners in a conspicuous position on the right bank of the river and
promised to spare their lives if they would hail their comrades as they should
pass down, and induce them to surrender. But they, being weary and despairing
of meeting ClarkĂ¯Â¿Â½s army, landed about 10 oĂ¯Â¿Â½clock A. M., August 25, at the
mouth of an inlet, since called LocheryĂ¯Â¿Â½s creek, where they landed their
horses to feed on the grass. While preparing a repast of the meat of a buffalo
which they had killed, they were assailed by a volley of rifle balls from an
overhanging bluff, where the Indians had assembled in large force. The men,
being thus surprised, seized their arms, and defended themselves until their
ammunition was exhausted, and then attempted to escape in their boats, but, as
they were unwieldy, as the water was low, and the men too weak to render them
available, they only 106 strong, were obliged to surrender to more that 300
Indians, who hastily massacred Lochery and several of their prisoners, which
Brandt, or whoever their chief commanding was, condemned. Forty-two of those
prisoners were killed, and 64 were taken prisoners. Among the latter was
Captain Orr, whose arm was broken in the engagement, who was taken to
Sandusky, where he was retained for several months, when, his captors not
being able to properly treat his fracture, he was removed to the hospital at
Detroit, whence he was that winter removed to Montreal, and with his fellow
prisoners was exchanged after the close of the revolutionary war, and returned
to Westmoreland county in the summer of 1783, his house and property having
been destroyed by the burning of Hannastown July 13, 1782. He was one of the
few men who were in LocheryĂ¯Â¿Â½s unfortunate expedition that ever reached their
homes. Soon after his return he raised another company to serve two months in
the defense of the frontier, which advanced to the mouth of Bull creek, on the
right bank of the Allegheny river, where Tarentum now is, where, under his
direction, a blockhouse was built. Having completed that term of service
satisfactorily, he was elected the same fall (1783) sheriff of Westmoreland
county, and was prompt and faithful in the discharge of his official duties.
From the time of his settlement in what is now Sugar Creek township he resided
on the heretofore-mentioned McDonald-Monteith-Dinsmore-Wilson tract until
about 1812, when he removed to this tract, on which he remained until he
rented his farm to Solomon Rumbaugh, about 1824, about which time he removed
to Kittanning. When this county was organized for judicial purposes in 1805,
he was appointed one of the three associate judges of its several courts,
which position he creditably filled until his death. By the act of assembly of
March 30, 1821, the state treasurer of Pennsylvania was authorized to pay him
or his order, immediately thereafter, $750, in consideration of his services
and losses during the revolutionary war, which was to be considered as a full
compensation for those services and losses, including all his claims for
military service.

In 1818 or 1819 he laid out north of his residence on this tract, and west
of the present Kittanning and BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend road, the town of Orrsville, the
plan of which is not on record, and the writer has not been able to ascertain
the exact number of the lots which it contained. Its first separate assessment
list was in 1819, when Henry Torringer was assessed with Nos. 44 and 46,
seated, at $25 each and William Shea, tailor, with lots Nos. 53 and 56,
seated, and his occupation at $75. Robert Robinson, sheriff, sold TorringerĂ¯Â¿Â½s
two lots on a judgement in favor of J. E. Brown for $30.20Ă¯Â¿Â½, of debt, and
$6.74 of costs, on the premises, to Robert Orr, Sr., September 23, 1822, for
$15 each and executed his deed therefor the next day, both of which the latter
conveyed to James Adams, May 2, 1831, for $30. These last two conveyances are
the only ones of lots in that town of Orrsville on record.

The assessment shows that these Torringer lots were “transferred to
William Adams,” and the Shea ones were “taxt to John McClatchey”
in 1824. James Torringer had his blacksmith-shop on one of these lots about
1823-4.

Robert Orr, Sr., conveyed his interest in this tract to his sons Chambers
and Robert, May 7, 1831, which, and the parcel of the Moore tract which Adams
had sold to them, they conveyed to Christopher Foster (of Thomas), 199 acres,
except all the Orrsville lots that had been sold by their father, and for
which the purchase money had been paid.

The violent tornado that occurred on the 29th or 30th of May, 1860, began
to move with or to gather its devastating force on the Kittanning and BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s
Bend road on this tract, between Christopher FosterĂ¯Â¿Â½s house and barn, where
it swept in a course slightly south of east to David C. PorterfieldĂ¯Â¿Â½s and
turned thence northeasterly to William A. FosterĂ¯Â¿Â½s, tearing off the roof and
upper story of his house. He was absent at the time. As he saw, returning from
Middlesex, the storm moving toward his house, apprehensive for the safety of
his two young children whom he had left there, he hastened thither with utmost
speed. The little girl, when she saw the storm approaching, took the little
boy with her from the house, and both, as they were just about to encounter
it, lay down in a gutter, which proved to be a place of safety for them. It
passed thence northeasterly through Washington township, crossed the Allegheny
river a short distance above the mouth of Sugar Camp run, through Madison
township with slight deflections to Red Bank creek nearly east of Owen now
Thomas MeredithĂ¯Â¿Â½s residence, moving everything in its course.

Lewis Bish said he was standing on a hillside of Red Bank creek, between
the old Red Bank Furnace and William ShoemakerĂ¯Â¿Â½s, while the tornado passed
above him. It did not disturb anything where he then was, some sand fell on
him while viewing it; the hillside is steep and the bench of the hill was 100
feet above; he saw the largest trees whirling in the air above him, and felt
thankful that none of them fell on him. William ShoemakerĂ¯Â¿Â½s house, near
AnthonyĂ¯Â¿Â½s tunnel, except the sleepers and kitchen floor, was swept away. Two
boards having been taken out of the floor, a small nursing child was dropped
down through the opening thus made and was unhurt. Neither the cradle in which
that child was, nor any part of the house or spring-house, was ever found, nor
any part of the barn which was blown away. The orchard, except six stumps of
apple-trees whose bark was stripped off, was uprooted and borne along in the
irresistible current of the tornado. Pieces of stone were driven so deeply
into these stumps that Lewis W. Corbett could not draw them out. The fences
were strewn all over the farm, and Shoemaker was so seriously injured that he
was disabled from work for several weeks. Passing with increased force through
the southern part of Clarion county, it swept away everything in its track.
Passing about half a mile north of New Bethlehem, it reached Charles StewartĂ¯Â¿Â½s
place while the family were at dinner. Mrs. Stewart, as the door opened,
exclaimed: Ă¯Â¿Â½What a storm is coming!Ă¯Â¿Â½ which struck the house while she was
attempting to close the door, and removed it some distance from its
foundation. She was found lying between two rafters and beneath a heavy piece
of oak timber, whose crushing weight caused her death in three hours. Her
child was in the cradle, which dropped into the cellar, where it was found in
the same position in which it had been in the room, with its occupant
uninjured. The rest of the family were scattered over the meadow and more or
less injured. StewartĂ¯Â¿Â½s barn was ignited by what appeared to Philip Huffman
to be a stream of burning fluid, two feet thick, borne along by a dark cloud.
The grass in some places was burned to the ground. Some of the timber, used
two years afterward in building John HenryĂ¯Â¿Â½s barn, was so imbedded with
small stones that it could scarcely be worked. John DoughertyĂ¯Â¿Â½s daughter,
about sixteen, in attempting to escape from the house, was killed by a falling
log, while those who remained about the chimney suffered no injury except a
few light scratches. Valentine Miller, who resided across the hollow from
DoughertyĂ¯Â¿Â½s, his mother, wife and children were together in a log house
which was struck by the tornado. The superstructure was blown away, but they,
having huddled about the chimney, were not injured. It struck John MohneyĂ¯Â¿Â½s
house north of Millville in the absence of himself and wife. Their oldest son,
when he saw it approaching, ordered all the children into the cellar; taking
the youngest in his arms, he sprang to the foot of the cellar stairs, and
before he had time to think of anything the house was blown away, but neither
he nor any of the children were injured. The bank barn was nearly leveled to
the ground, and a heavy new four-horse wagon standing back of the barn was
found crushed within the foundation of the barn, and a new wheelbarrow at the
other end of the barn was blown into the top of a maple tree about 75 rods
distant, where it was found unbroken. John Shields and his horses were blown
over and over through a large field about half a mile east of MohneyĂ¯Â¿Â½s
without serious harm.

When the tornado struck Maysville, Dr. Stramley was having his horses shod
at the blacksmith shop, which was blown away and the blacksmith seriously
injured; the horses were borne some distance, and when the storm ceased the
doctor was found lying in the middle of the street beside a large dog; the
latter, which was well enough before the storm, was dead. The doctorĂ¯Â¿Â½s
boots, coat and hat flew away, and were never again seen by him; he never
afterward saw any part of his buggy but the seat, which was found a quarter of
a mile up the creek. The bridge and every building in that town was swept
away. There were three run of buhrs in the gristmill, ne set of which was
turned upside down; another pair were carried up to the dam and left setting
as they were in the mill; the third pair fell into the millpit; and the
gearing was blown away, only pieces of the metal part having since been found.
The book kept by the miller was afterward found 65 miles distant in Union
county. Irvin McFarlandĂ¯Â¿Â½s hotel was borne diagonally across the street and
precipitated down the bank of the creek above the bridge. His wife, who was in
it, lived about two and a half hours after her removal. He, in searching for
his little boy, four years old, thought he heard a noise like his voice, and,
in endeavoring to follow the sound, he approached a pile of brick – the large
brick chimney had tumbled into a pile where it stood – and, thinking he could
hear the sound more distinctly, he began to throw the loose brick off the
pile. About four feet of the foundation was still standing, at the side of the
lower part of which he found his boy unharmed, with his right had extended as
high as he could reach against the chimney. Adam Bachman was carried, with his
own building, a short distance, and died of the injury which he received. All
that was ever found of the three new wagons at the blacksmith shop, one
finished, and two unfinished, were the rims of two wheels and a few spokes
left on the ground where the wagons were.

The width of that tornado varied from 30 rods to half a mile. It carried
everything before it where it was the widest, but its force was greatest where
it was narrowest, plowing up the ground three feet deep and from three to five
feet wide, swinging trees on the ground, large oaks around, as if on pivots,
one-fourth in a circle, and pruning off all the branches within reach. It took
a northeasterly course three miles south of Brookville, and, passing through
Clearfield, Union and other counties in this state, struck the ocean between
New York and Philadelphia.

Thus sped to the mighty deep that tornado which, wherever else it was
generated, began its devastating career in a whirlwind in the public road on
this Orr-Foster tract, reminding one of DeKayĂ¯Â¿Â½s description of this
destructive force of nature, which closes thus:

 

“And as in court-yard corners on the wind
Sweep the loose straws, houses and stately trees
Whirl in a vortex. His unswerving tread
Winnows the isle bare as a thresherĂ¯Â¿Â½s floor,
His eyes are fixed; he looks not once behind,
But at his back fall silence and the breeze. Scarce is he come, the lovely
wraith is sped.
Ashamed the lightning shuts its purple door,
And heaven still knows the robes of gold and sun
While placid ruin gently greets the sun.”*

_______________________________________________________________
*The church edifice of the Medway Presbyterian congregation, frame, one story,
36 V 54 feet, ceiling 18 feet, was erected in the summer of 1880, and its
interior is very nearly finished and furnished. It was dedicated Friday,
October 29, the services being conducted by Rev. David Hull, D. D. of Indiana,
Pennsylvania.

Adjoining these Moore and Orr-Conly tracts on the east and the division
line between the deprecation and donation lands, is one, a rectangular
parallelogram, 356 acres and 37 perches, on which John Davis was an early
settler, with 200 acres of which and 1 cow he was assessed, in 1805, at $126.
Josiah White acquired an early interest in it. James Fulton having obtained a
judgement against White, his interest was sold by John Orr, sheriff, to Robert
Brown, for the use of Charles Campbell, for $450, to whom the deed was
executed June 23, 1808, Campbell and Nicholas Day having agreed, the dat
before, with Fulton, that Campbell should make him the sheriffĂ¯Â¿Â½s deed,
including all of DavisĂ¯Â¿Â½ interest in the 200 acres, and Campbell and Day
agreed to pay one-half of the purchase money and of the fees on the patent,
and Fulton agreed to make to them a deed in fee simple. That agreement was,
however, to be void if the sheriffĂ¯Â¿Â½s sale should ne set aside, unless the
sale should be again made good, and Fulton also agreed to acknowledge
satisfaction of the sum at which the land was struck down to Brown, in order
that the sheriffĂ¯Â¿Â½s deed might be acknowledged in court. All these
preliminaries must have been satisfactorily adjusted, for Campbell conveyed
the 200 acres to Fulton, October 31, for $454. The patent was granted to
Campbell, January 19, 1819. After the latterĂ¯Â¿Â½s death, July 5, 1819, Campbell
conveyed to Robert Orr, Sr., and John Patton 100 acres and 36 perches, which
he had agreed to sell to Fulton, in trust for the persons claiming under
Fulton, which they conveyed to Andrew McKee, Sr., December 25, 1820, who had
agreed to purchase, and had paid the purchase money for the same. One hundred
and forty acres of this tract appears to have been vested in John Brown, for
he conveyed that quantity to Andrew and Thomas McKee, October 25, 1819, for
$775, which became vested in the latter, who conveyed 115 acres to his son,
Thomas V. McKee, July 17, 1855, for $800, and which the latter conveyed to
William H. Leard, October 20, 1866, for $3,300. Andrew McKee conveyed 100
acres and 36 perches to Andrew Rodgers, December 27, 1830, for $800, which,
with another parcel, his heirs conveyed to Joseph and Samuel Rodgers, November
17, 1849, for $1 “as well as other good considerations.”

Next north is a similar tract, 405 acres, on which are the names of Robert
Buchanan and John Clark, to one or both of whom the warrant was probably
granted in 1794, whose interests having become vested in John Orr, the patent
was granted to him February 19, 1818. He conveyed 122 acres and 94 perches to
Jacob Bish, Sr., April 17, 1818, for $366, which the latter conveyed to Jacob
Bish, Jr., April 6, 1853, for $800. Orr conveyed 50 acres and 113 perches to
Henry Buzzard, June 13, for $52, which the latter conveyed to Leonard Rumbaugh,
April 1, 1828, for $125, which he conveyed to Jacob Hepler, Sr., September 9,
1837, for $150, who conveyed the same to William Hepler, September 2, 1847,
for $800. Orr agreed to sell 24 acres to Joseph Blaine, October 15, 1819, for
$54, to whom the deed for which was made by the grantorĂ¯Â¿Â½s administrators
November 12, 1826, by virtue of a decree of the proper court, and which parcel
was included in BlaineĂ¯Â¿Â½s conveyance of 134 acres to Robert Farley and
others, trustees of the BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend Iron Company, April 14, 1846, for $500.
Orr agreed, August 28, 1820, to convey 70 acres and 87 perches, as surveyed by
Robert Orr, Jr., September 25, 1819, to Peter Bish, to whom the formerĂ¯Â¿Â½s
administrators, by virtue of a decree of the proper court, executed a deed
November 12, 1826, 12 acres and 132 perches of which the latter agreed,
October 20, 1865, to convey to James Bish, and which the latter conveyed to
David Harmon, June 12, 1868, for $384. In the northwest corner of the map, and
on MeredithĂ¯Â¿Â½s more recent connected drafts, is a rectangular parcel of 40
acres bearing the name of Peter Harmon.

Adjoining the Buchanan-Clark-Orr tract on the north is a similar one, 416
acres 55 perches, in which James McCoy had an inchoate interest, on which
Frederick Shoop was an early settler, with 100 acres of which, 2 horses and 2
cows, he was assessed, in 1805, at $102, and the next year with 1 cow and 1
horse less at $71.

On July 18, 1807, Shoop, by written article of agreement, agreed to convey
to Peter Harmon, of Hempfield township, Westmoreland county, 100 acres of this
tract, then adjoining Nicholas Pontious, Jacob Millison and Melchior Buzzard,
on which Jacob Hepler was then living, for $550, and both parties were to
occupy the cabin then erected thereon until they could erect one suitable for
the habitation of Harmon and his family, which, 102 acres 90 perches, ShoopĂ¯Â¿Â½s
administrators conveyed to HarmonĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs, Catherine and John Harmon, and
Hannah, wife of Barnabas Vensel.

Shoop agreed, October 29, 1813, to sell to James Blain [sic] 100 acres, for
$300, in four annual payments, a part of each to consist of 1 cow, to be
valued nu two neighbors, if the parties could not agree upon the price.

Shoop also agreed, November 15, 1813, to sell to John Linaberry (Linaberger)
100 acres adjoining Conrad Moyers, John read and Peter Harmon, for $100, of
which $45 were to be Ă¯Â¿Â½in good, lawful money,Ă¯Â¿Â½ and $55 Ă¯Â¿Â½in trade or
produce at market price.Ă¯Â¿Â½ Shoop received the same day $27 in cash and $16 in
trade. The agreement and payment were duly proven in the court of common pleas
of this county by the affidavit of Peter Wiles, September 23, 1818, and there
ends the record.

The warrant for the entire tract, about one-third of which is what is now
BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend township, was granted to Scoop March 8, 1814, to whom it was
surveyed, and the patent was granted to John Hepler, his administrator, and
Margaret Shoop, his administratrix, September 8, 1819. ShoopĂ¯Â¿Â½s
administrators conveyed to Blain the parcel which Shoop had sold to him, to
Deborah and Joseph Blain, executors of James Blain, which he had vested to
Joseph Blain, and was included in his conveyance to the BradyĂ¯Â¿Â½s Bend
company.

Adjoining the McCoy-Shoop tract on the east is one, a rectangular
parallelogram, 401 acres and 102 perches, lengthwise east and west, for which
a warrant was probably granted to John Buchanan in 1793. This tract was
conveyed by Presley C. Lane, United States marshal for the western district of
Pennsylvania, to John Reynolds, May 19, 1802, who conveyed it to John Vensel
(formerly written Wentzel), June 22, 1805, for Ă¯Â¿Â½50 Ă¯Â¿Â½lawful money of
Pennsylvania.Ă¯Â¿Â½ Vensel was assessed with 300 acres of this tract and 3 cattle
in 1805, at $142, and the next year, with an additional head of cattle, at
$148, and on which he erected his sawmill in 1807. By virtue of a writ of
Vend. Ex. No. 9, March term, 1814, on a judgement in favor of Samuel S.
Harrison for the use of John Wells, it was sold by John McCormick, sheriff, to
Jacob Hershey and Frederick Howard, June 20, 1814, for $505, and so much
thereof as was needed was applied to the payment of a prior judgement in favor
of John Reynolds against Vensil [sic]. Howard conveyed his 150 acres to David
Snyder, March 10, 1825, for $250, to whose heirs this parcel still belongs,
and from whom the run by which the tract is traversed has been called SnyderĂ¯Â¿Â½s
run. HersheyĂ¯Â¿Â½s heirs released their interest in the other purpart of 150
acres to Andrew Hershey, February 17, 1845, for $100. It is probable that
Jacob Hepler, whose name is on this tract on the map, occupied HowardĂ¯Â¿Â½s
portion of it until the latterĂ¯Â¿Â½s sale to Snyder.

Adjoining the Moyer portion of that Buchanan-Reynolds-Vensel tract is a
similarly-shaped one, 400 acres and 112 perches, lengthwise from north to
south, the warrant for which was granted probably to William Buchanan in 1794,
who conveyed his inchoate interest to Alexander Blair, who conveyed his
interest therein to Josiah White, June 20, 1811, for $200 paid by Thomas
Taylor, and $200 paid by White per Taylor, and empowered White to take the
title-papers out of the land-office, to whom the patent was granted December
5, 1837, and who conveyed 216 acres of the southern part to Jacob Rumbaugh,
January 23, 1840, 80 acres of which the latter conveyed to Samuel Phillips,
July 1, 1845, for $480. White conveyed a parcel covered by his above-mentioned
patent and his other one, granted November 13, 1839, to Thomas Leard, February
26, 1840, which he conveyed to Charles Wick, March 13, 1841, which he conveyed
to James P. Wick, February 26, 1849, who conveyed the same, 133 acres, to John
M. Gillespie and Charles McKeever, November 21, for $950, who and Manasses
McKeever conveyed 20 acres and 6 perches to Samuel Phillips, January 10, 1856,
for $250, and 41 acres and 106 perches to Nimrod Flick, same dat, for $500.
Charles McKeever conveyed to Flick 4 acres and 105 perches, January 5, 1859,
for $93, to whom also Charles McKeeverĂ¯Â¿Â½s administrator, Stephen McCue,
conveyed 26 acres, June 15, 1860, for $384; Hugh McKeever committee of
Manasses McKeever, conveyed to Joseph McElroy, June 8, 1861, for $300, who
conveyed 22 acres to James Brownfield, April 5, 1863.

Next south of that Buchanan-Blair-White tract was one of a similar shape
and of nearly the same area, the patent for which was granted to Charles
Campbell, March 22, 1816, who conveyed 100 acres and 22 perches to William
Blaney, June 24, 1819, for $250. Blaney by his will dated September 6, and
registered September 16, 1842, devised that and another parcel mentioned
below, being the farm on which he then lived, to his son John. Campbell
conveyed the southern part of this tract, 200 acres, to James C. Porterfield,
September 13, 1816, for $500, who occupied it for several years, and by his
will dated November 8, and registered December 30, 1837, he devised it to his
son, David C. The second schoolhouse in this township was built on this parcel
about 1814, and the first teacher in it was David Cunningham, after whom that
last-mentioned devise was named.

Adjoining the Campbell-Blaney-Porterfield tract on the east and the
depreciation line on the south, is another of the same shape, 356 acres and 37
perches, March 1, 1794, which was conveyed to Charles Campbell, June 15, 1814,
for $200. The early settler on it was Alexander Foster, who was assessed with
100 acres, 1 horse and 1 cow in 1805 at $91. Campbell conveyed to him 100
acres and 25 perches, June 14, 1821, for $10. Foster acquired title to the
rest of this tract, except about 90 acres in the northwestern part, which
constituted the farm on which he lived at the time of his death, and which by
his will, dated April 17, 1828, and registered May 19, 1838, he devised to his
sons, Christopher, Thomas and William, which he directed to be divided in
three equal parts as to quantity, and allotted the part on which was the
house, in which he then lived, to Christopher, the west end to Thomas, and the
northeastern part to William.

William McKean acquired an interest in 93 acres in the northwestern part of
this tract, which was conveyed by Philip Mechling, sheriff, to James Monteith,
March 23, 1819, who devised it to his daughters. The legal title to this
parcel having become vested temporarily in Thomas Foster and Robert Orr they
conveyed it to Dr. John Gilpin and William Johnston, who, and their wives,
MonteithĂ¯Â¿Â½s daughters, conveyed it to William Blaney, November 13, 1843, for
$500.

Adjoining the Shields-Foster tract on the north is a similar one, 405 acres
and 112 perches, the warrant for which was granted to William Campbell and
which was improved and settled by John Crawford, who was assessed with 220
acres and 3 cattle in 1805 and 1806, at $114. The warranteeĂ¯Â¿Â½s interest
having been transferred to Ă¯Â¿Â½Judge James Wilson,Ă¯Â¿Â½ and vested in Charles
Campbell, he and Crawford agreed March 25, 1825, on such a division as that
CrawfordĂ¯Â¿Â½s 200 acres should include the settlement which he had made and for
which he had paid taxes for the land, and Crawford agreed to prove his
settlement on the tract, so as to enable Campbell to obtain the patent.
Campbell and Crawford conveyed the entire tract to James Hart for the purpose
of enabling him to procure the patent for them. Crawford, desiring him to make
a deed for his purpart, brought an ejectment suit therefor to No. 41, December
tern, 1837, in the common pleas of this county, which resulted in a verdict,
September 20, 1838, for the plaintiff, on which judgement was rendered
September 22. By consent of the parties the verdict was to be released on the
defendant procuring a patent for the whole tract in the name of William
Campbell, and executing a conveyance to the plaintiff for one-half of the
whole tract, which was to be delivered within six months, and the plaintiff
was to furnish the necessary proof of settlement and conveyances to enable the
defendant to procure the patent, which was granted January 9, 1839. Crawford
conveyed his entire interest in his purpart to his son John, April 20, 1839,
for $1 Ă¯Â¿Â½and natural love and affection,Ă¯Â¿Â½ 67 acres and 73 perches of which
he conveyed to Alexander Crawford, February 16, 1861, for $22.50.

The Campbell purpart was included in the conveyance of Jacob Mechling,
sheriff, to Daniel Stannard, December 7, 1828, who conveyed 200 acres to James
Hart, June 5, 1855, for $1,000, who conveyed 67 acres and 44 perches to Thomas
Templeton, May 20, 1841, for $326.

Adjoining the eastern part of that Campbell-Crawford tract on the north and
the Buchanan-Vensil [sic] tract on the east is a hexagonal one, 448 acres and
89 perches, the southern part of which extends, like the short blade of a
carpenterĂ¯Â¿Â½s square, eastward into what is now Washington township. The map
indicates that the warrantee was James Buchanan, The warrant was granted to
him February 3, 1794, but in one of the conveyances, Charles Thompson, is
mentioned as the warrantee. Its earliest settler was Archibald Thompson, who
made his improvement in February, and settlement on it April 9, 1801, surveyed
by Ross, deputy surveyor, November 3, 1802, and who was assessed with 400
acres of it and 1 horse, in 1804 and 1806, at $120. It was sold for taxes, and
Robert Brown, county treasurer, conveyed it to William Brown, September 17,
1816, for $9, who assigned his interest in it to James Monteith, December 11,
for $13. It is in that treasurerĂ¯Â¿Â½s deed that Charles Thompson is mentioned
as the warrantee. Monteith obtained a judgement against Archibald Thompson for
$56 of debt, on which it was sold, and was conveyed by Joseph Brown, sheriff,
to Monteith, September 17, 1816, for $20, who conveyed it to Philip Templeton,
Sr. He, by his will heretofore mentioned, devised it to his sons Samuel and
Thomas, the former of whom transferred his undivided half to the latter in
1829, and conveyed it, July 14, 1836, for $200, to whom the patent was
granted, June 26, 1838, he having been first assessed with 200 acres if it,
and 1 cow, in 1824, at $76. He erected his sawmill near the mouth of SnyderĂ¯Â¿Â½s
run, in 1843, which was then assessed at $150. T. Templeton & Co. Were
first assessed with 2 mills, in 1849, at $300, and 1 factory, at $150; T.
Templeton with a furnace in 1852, and with a distillery, in 1854, at $50. His
last assessment with mills was in 1856, at $100. Thomas Templeton conveyed 120
perches to the school directors of this township, October 31, 1850, which
parcel was to revert to him if it should cease to be used for school-purposes
for a period of three years; and, May 13, 1855, 111 acres and 158 perches,
nearly all off [sic] this tract, to his son James S., for $600 Ă¯Â¿Â½and natural
love and affection;Ă¯Â¿Â½ and 106 acres and 56 perches, small portions of which
were taken off the parcels which he had purchased from James Hart and Thomas
McKee, to his son John, for the same consideration, James conveyed his parcel
to his uncle, Philip Templeton, October 14, 1864, for $1,800; and as
administrator, by virtue of an order of the orphansĂ¯Â¿Â½ court of this county,
he conveyed the residue of his fatherĂ¯Â¿Â½s real estate, about 332 acres, to the
same, June 6, for $4,500; 22 acres of which he conveyed to David Hepler, April
12, 1873, for $1,100.

In 1865 the Templeton Oil Company was organized and drilled a well about
1,500 feet deep, near the mouth of SnyderĂ¯Â¿Â½s run, on this tract, at a cost of
about $6,000. There was in the course of the drilling a slight but not
remunerative show of oil, the Ă¯Â¿Â½smellingĂ¯Â¿Â½ for which was not of course
successful.

The Sugar Creek and Phillipsburgh Ferry Company, with a capital stock of
$300, each share, $10, was organized in 1878, for the purpose of transporting
passengers, animals, vehicles and freight across the Allegheny river, with its
principal place of business at this point, named Ferryton in the charter. John
Templeton was chosen president, Henry C. Pritner secretary and treasurer, John
E., Thomas and William B. Templeton, directors of the company for the first
year. The letters patent were granted by Governor Hartranft, January 2, 1879.

Adjoining that Buchanan-Thompson tract on the east and north is a
trapezoidal one, 390 acres, the warrant for which was granted to Adam Maxwell,
and the patent to James Watterson, February 8, 1820 who, in pursuance of a
previous agreement, conveyed it to Archibald McCall and Samuel A. Gilmore,
August 9, 1836, for $1, who conveyed it to Joseph White, July 9, 1839, for
$300, and which he conveyed to Joseph Hicks, March 31, 1846, for $1,400, to
whose heirs it now belongs, being partly in Washington township.

Contiguous to the Buchanan-Thompson tract n the south is one, 447 acres and
116 perches, a rectangular parallelogram, partly in what is now Washington
township, the warrant for which was granted to James Campbell, in 1794, on
which John Elder was the early settler, with 400 acres of which and 1 horse he
was assessed, in 1805, at $185, and the next year, with the same and 1 cow, at
$190, when it was transferred to Andrew Blair, to whom it was assessed until
1812, after which it was occupied by James Elder, to whom 100 acres of it, 1
horse and 1 cow were assessed, in 1813, at $76. The patent for the entire
tract was granted to Charles Campbell, June 2, 1828, who conveyed it the same
year, to Thomas Foster, who conveyed 150 acres if it to James Elder for $1 and
the settlerĂ¯Â¿Â½s right, which he conveyed to Robert Thorn, shoemaker, March 9,
1833, for $300, which the latter conveyed to Joseph Thorn, August 15, 1844,
for $500, 75 acres of which he conveyed to David Hays, August 20, 1844, for
$750, and 83 acres to David W. Burk [sic], six days later, for $800, which he
conveyed to David hays, April 26, 1847, for $550. Hays conveyed 186 acres to
Robert Hays, May 19, 1852, for $625, and 12 acres and 82 perches to Henry
Coffman, February 6, 1861, which the latter conveyed to Robert Hays, February
16, 1862, for $191.

Foster conveyed 265 acres and 135 perches of his purpart to Thomas McKee,
September 15, 1831, for $450, 5 acres and 2 perches of which he conveyed to
Thomas Templeton, April 28, 1832, for $14. McKee resided on this tract until
his decease, where he opened his store prior to 1860. He died intestate, and
in proceedings in partition the inquest valued the residue of this parcel, 264
acres, as surveyed by J. E. Meredith, February 2, 1867, at $8,470, which was
not taken by any of the heirs at the appraisement, but all of them except one
having conveyed their interests to Thomas V. McKee, the court decreed, June 3,
1867, that this land be awarded to him.

Between the Campbell-Elder tract and the depreciation line is a similar
one, 367 acres and 52 perches, the warrant for which was granted to Samuel
Dixon, March 1, 1794, who conveyed his interest in it to Charles Campbell,
June 19, 1814, for $400, to whom the patent was granted, June 16, 1816, on
which Samuel Elder was the early settler, to whom it was surveyed by Ross,
deputy surveyor, March 6, 1805, and with 200 acres of which, 1 horse and 2
cows he was assessed in 1805, at $117, and the next year, with 1 cow less, at
$111. His widow remained in the tenure of it several years after his death,
who was succeeded by Abraham Swartzlander in 1827, who was assessed in 1834,
as a shoemaker. This tract was included in the conveyance of Jacob Mechling,
sheriff, to Daniel Stannard, December 7, 1828, and in the agreement between
James Campbell and Dr. Gilpin, and in StannardĂ¯Â¿Â½s conveyance to the latter,
January 29, 1840. McCall claimed an interest in it, which Charles Campbell in
his lifetime agreed to purchase. George A. McCall, then of Memphis, Tennessee,
having brought an ejectment against Abraham Swartzlander and other occupants
in the circuit court of the United States to recover it, Gilpin purchased his
interest, which was conveyed to him, October 26, 1839, for $500. Gilpin
conveyed 100 acres to Jacob Hepler, Jr., August 25, 1845, for $650, and 135
acres and 118 perches to George Kenworthy, June 21, 1834, for $1,357.77, which
Kenworthy conveyed to William B. Srader, September 27, for $2,443,27, and
which the latter conveyed to Isaac C. Steele, August 9, 1871, for $6,400.
Those two parcels are chiefly, if not wholly, in what is now Washington
township. Elder, widow Elder and Swartzlander probably occupied the western
part of the tract. The records are obscure respecting the disposition of the
settlerĂ¯Â¿Â½s purpart. It is noted on the assessment list for 1837, which was
made in the fall of 1836, that the 256 acres that had been assessed to
Swartzlander for several years were Ă¯Â¿Â½transferred to Alexander Foster, Sr.,Ă¯Â¿Â½
of whose farm the western part of this tract was a portion included in his
devises to his sons Christopher and William.

The first census taken after Sugar Creek was reduced to its present area
was that of 1860, when its population was 1, 101/ in 1870, it was: Native,
969; foreign, 54. Its number of taxables in 1876 is 287. The assessment list
made in the last-mentioned year shows the occupations of the inhabitants
exclusive of the agricultural portion to have been: Laborers, 25; carpenters,
6; blacksmiths, 3; merchant, 1 – there were at least 3; miller, 1; shoemakers,
2.

1860. Number schools, 9; average number months taught, 4; male teachers, 9;
average salaries per month, $20; male scholars, 196; female scholars, 163;
average number attending school, 204; amount levied for school purposes,
$884,88; cost of teaching each scholar per month, 56 cents; received from
state appropriation, $143,35; from collectors, $520; cost of instruction,
$720; fuel, etc., $90; cost of schoolhouse, $20.

1876. Number schools, 9; average number of months taught, 5; make teachers,
5; female teachers, 4; average number of salaries per month, both male and
female, $30; male scholars, 143; female scholars, 129; average number
attending school, 200; cost per month, $1.06; tax levied, $1,860; received
from state appropriation, $227.85; from taxes, etc., $2,327.90; paid teachers,
$1,350; fuel, etc., $771.75.

The people of this township voted on the license question, February 28,
1873, thus: Against granting licenses, 63; for licenses, 39.

Geological. The surface rocks in this township consist largely of the Lower
Barrens. This is evident from the smooth condition of its upland farms. The
lower productive rocks skirt the eastern edge of the township, and in the
northeast corner, where the river touches the ferriferous limestone, are also
above water-level for a short distance on Little Buffalo creek near FosterĂ¯Â¿Â½s
mills. The upper Freeport coal is small and unimportant in this section.
Further west below the Catholic church it expands to four feet thick, and has
its limestone underneath it.

Structure An anticlinal axis extends across the southeast corner of the
township, so that, westward from this past Adams, the dip is to the northwest,
which explains the absence of coal and the presence here of the Lower Barrens.

Source: Page(s) 201-213, History of Armstrong County,
Pennsylvania by Robert Walker Smith, Esq. Chicago: Waterman, Watkins &
Co., 1883.
Transcribed December 2000 by Linda Mockenhaupt for the Armstrong County Smith
Project.
Contributed by Linda Mockenhaupt for use by the Armstrong County Genealogy
Project (http://www.pa-roots.com/armstrong/)

Armstrong County Genealogy Project Notice:
These electronic pages cannot be reproduced in any format, for any
presentation, without prior written permission.

Return to the Historical Index

Return to the Smith Project

About Author

Leave a Comment