General Daniel Brodhead

General Daniel Brodhead

line.gif (2154 bytes)

General Daniel Brodhead, of revolutionary fame, whose portrait appears
elsewhere in this volume, was born in Marbletown, Ulster county, New York, in
1736, and died and was buried in Milford, Pennsylvania, November 15, 1809. He
was the great-grandson of Capt. Daniel Brodhead, of the English army, who came
to this country in 1664, as a member of the expedition commanded by Col.
Richard Nichols, in the service of King Charles II, after the Restoration.
After the surrender of Stuyvesant Capt. Brodhead was sent up to Albany, in
September, 1664, and was a witness to the treaty made with the Indians there
in that month. He was afterward promoted to the command of the military forces
of Ulster county, by commission from King Charles, dated September 14, 1665,
which position he held till his death in 1670. He left one daughter and two
sons Ă¯Â¿Â½ Ann Brodhead, Charles Brodhead and Richard Brodhead. The latter was
born at Marbletown, New York, in 1666, and was the grandfather of General
Brodhead. Richard Brodhead had two sons, Richard Brodhead, Jr., and Daniel
Brodhead, born in Marbletown, Ulster county, New York, in the year 1698, and
died at Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, in the year 1755. This Daniel Brodhead, the
father of the subject of this biography, removed with his family from Ulster
county, New York, in the year 1737, to Danville, Pennsylvania, while the
subject of this biography was but an infant. Inured to the dangers of the
Indian frontier from his very cradle, the impression made as he grew up among
the scenes of Indian barbarities, and the outrages of the savages, helped to
form his future character and to mold him into the grand, successful soldier
and Indian fighter which his subsequent history proved him to be.

General Brodhead first appeared prominently in public life when he was
elected a deputy from Berks county to a provincial meeting which met at
Philadelphia, July 15, 1774, and served on a committee which reported sixteen
resolutions, one of which recommended the calling of a continental congress
and acts of non-importation and non-exportation from Great Britain. These were
among the first steps toward the revolution which followed.

At the beginning of the war of the revolution he was commissioned by the
assembly of Pennsylvania at Philadelphia as colonel of the 8th regt.
PA Colonial Troops. He first participated in the battle of Long Island. Before
the close of the battle he commanded the whole of the Pennsylvania contingent
troops, composed of several battalions. He was especially mentioned by
Washington in his report to congress on this battle, for brave and meritorious
conduct. He also participated in several other battles of the revolution.
Having received the approbation of Washington, he was sent by him, in June,
1778, with his troops to Fort Muncy, where he rebuilt that fort formerly
destroyed by the Indians, which command he held until Washington, on the
following spring, recommended his selection to congress for the command of the
western department. Washington, being personally acquainted and warmly
attached to him, knew well his qualifications as a brave, judicious and
competent general. Washington, by sanction of congress, issued an order, dated
March 5, 1779, directing him to proceed to Fort Pitt, Pennsylvania, and take
charge of the western department, extending from the British possessions, at
Detroit, on the north, to the French possessions (Louisiana) on the south, a
command and responsibility equal to any in the revolutionary army.

Gen. Brodhead established the headquarters of his department at Fort Pitt,
now Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He had under his command the posts of Fort Pitt,
Fort McIntosh, Fort Laurens, Fort Tuscarora, Fort Wheeling, Fort Armstrong and
Fort HollidayĂ¯Â¿Â½s Cove. He made a number of successful expeditions in person
against the Indians with a large part of his command. In 1779 he executed a
brilliant march up the Allegheny with 605 men, penetrating into New York,
overcoming almost insurmountable difficulties, through a wilderness without
roads, driving the Indians before him, depopulating and destroying their
villages all along his route, killing and capturing many. This expedition
began August 11 and ended September 14, 1779, between 300 and 400 miles in
thirty-three days, through a wilderness without a road. Gen. Brodhead received
the thanks of congress for this expedition, and the following acknowledgement
from Gen. Washington: “The activity, perseverance and firmness which
marked the conduct of Gen. Brodhead, and that of all the officers and men of
every description in this expedition, do them great honor, and their services
entitle them to the thanks and to this testimonial of the generalĂ¯Â¿Â½s
acknowledgement.”

A great number of the thrilling Indian stories of which we read in the
present day occurred under Gen. BrodheadĂ¯Â¿Â½s command. The famous Capt. Brady
was a captain in Gen. BrodheadĂ¯Â¿Â½s eighth regiment, and seldom ever went out
on a scout but by orders from the general. Gen. BrodheadĂ¯Â¿Â½s devotion to the
cause of liberty was untiring. He never doubted the result of the war, and his
letters of encouragement to Gen. Washington and others are part of the history
of our country. In one, lamenting the coldness of some former patriots, he
writes: “There is nothing I so much fear as a dishonorable peace. For
heavenĂ¯Â¿Â½s sake, let every good man hold up his hands against it. We have
never suffered half I expected we should, and I am willing to suffer much more
for the glorious cause for which I have and wish to bleed.”

Gen. Brodhead had a treble warfare to wageĂ¯Â¿Â½a warfare which required the
genius and daring of a soldier, the diplomacy of a statesman and the good,
hard sense and clear judgment of an independent ruler over an extensive
country composed of a variety of elements. He waged war upon the unfriendly
Indians, and held as allies in friendship several friendly nations. He watched
and controlled, to a great extent, the British influence upon the Indians in
the direction of Detroit. He kept in subjection a large tory element west of
the mountains in sympathy with Great Britain, and punished them by
confiscating their surplus stores and provisions for the benefits of his
starving soldiers, when they had refused to sell to his commissary officers on
the credit of the government; but he never resorted to this punishment until
his starving soldiers paraded in a body in front of his quarters and announced
they had had no bread for five days.

On June 24, 1779, Gen. Brodhead issued his famous order directing Col.
Bayard to proceed to Kittanning and erect a fort at that point for the
protection of all settlers desiring to settle in that vicinity, and for the
better protection of the frontier.

After the erection of this fort settlers took up land and built their
houses around and in the vicinity of this fort, under its protection, until
the accumulation of houses and homes in the vicinity transformed the Indian
town of Kittanning into the present thriving capital of Armstrong county,
which can only justly and truthfully be acknowledged the result of the fort
erected by command of Gen. Brodhead, and which he was too modest to have
called after himself, regardless of the importunate efforts of Col. Bayard,
whom history shows to have earnestly entreated Brodhead to permit him to call
it Fort Brodhead.

Gen. B.Ă¯Â¿Â½s untiring watchfulness of the settlements along the Allegheny,
the building of his fort at Kittanning, his protection of the inhabitants in
its vicinity until they became numerous enough to defend themselves, his
modesty in not permitting the fort to be called after himself, justly entitle
him to the credit of being the founder of Kittanning, just as the erecting of
every fort on our western frontier from that day to this has been the
foundation of a city or town which invariably sprang from such a planting, as
Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, Leavenworth, Fort Dodge, Detroit, for never until that
time had Kittanning any white inhabitants, and never from that time until the
present has it been without white inhabitants.

In 1781, Gen. B. was given command of the 1st Pa. Colonial regt.,
and during that year received his full commission as general. His services
extended through the entire war of the revolution, and at its close he was
elected by the officers assembled at the cantonment of the American army on
the Hudson River, May 10, 1783, as one of the committee to prepare the
necessary papers for the organization of the Society of the Cincinnati. In
1789 Gen. Brodhead was elected by the Pennsylvania assembly surveyor-general
of the State of Pennsylvania, which position he held for nearly twelve years.

For his services in the revolution Gen. B. received several thousand acres
of land, which he located in Western Pennsylvania. Besides this he purchased
largely of land through Western Pennsylvania, Virginia and Kentucky. He
located much land in the vicinity of Kittanning and on the Allegheny, the
scenes of his former exploits, which he never ceased to love. His second
marriage was to the widow of Gen. Samuel Mifflin. He had but one child, Ann
Garton Brodhead. She married Casper Heiner, of Reading, Pennsylvania, a
surveyor by profession and an author of a series of mathematics.

To Ann Garton Heiner and her children Gen. Brodhead left all his lands and
property. Ann Garton Heiner had but one son, John Heiner, who removed to
Kittanning in 1812, and took possession of all the lands left him by his
grandfather, Gen. Brodhead.

Capt. John Heiner died and was buried in Indiana, Pennsylvania, in 1833. He
left but one son, Daniel Brodhead Heiner, late of Kittanning, Pennsylvania,
and three daughters, Ann Eliza, who married John Mechling, sheriff of
Armstrong county from 1845 to 1848; Margaret Heiner (Carson), of Sidney,
Illinois, and Catherine Heiner Smith, wife of Gov. George W. Smith, of
Lawrence, Kansas.

Ann Garton Brodhead Heiner had, beside her son John Heiner, four daughters,
Rebecca Heiner, who was the mother of the Hon. Henry Johnson, of Muncy,
Pennsylvania, presidential elector in 1848 on the whig ticket; state senator
of Pennsylvania, from 1861 to 1864, and chairman of the judiciary committee
and author of the bill to entitle soldiers to vote in the field (after the
supreme court of Pennsylvania had decided their voting unconstitutional). She
was the grandmother of Hon. Henry John Brodhead Cummings, colonel of the 39th
Ia. Inf. During the war of the rebellion, and member of congress from the Des
Moines district from 1877 to 1879. Ann Garton Brodhead HeinerĂ¯Â¿Â½s second
daughter (Margaret Heiner) married John Faulk, and was the mother of Hon.
Andrew J. Faulk, governor of Dakota, from August 4, 1866, to May 1, 1869, also
superintendent of Indian affairs for Dakota, and member of the committee, with
Gen. William T. Sherman, Gen. Stanley and others, which made the famous treaty
with the Sioux Indians at Fort Sully, Dakota, in 1868. Ann Garton Brodhead
HeinerĂ¯Â¿Â½s third daughter (Catherine Heiner) married Col. Brodhead, a distant
cousin, descended of a brother of Gen. Daniel Brodhead. Gen. BrodheadĂ¯Â¿Â½s
descendants by this marriage are the children of Geo. Brodhead, of Kittanning;
Mark Brodhead, of Washington; Mrs. Kate Van Wyke, wife of United States
Senator Van Wyke, of Nebraska, and Mrs. Van Auken, wife of John Van Auken,
member of congress from Pike county from 1867 to 1871, and Ann Gorton Brodhead
HeinerĂ¯Â¿Â½s fourth daughter (Mary Heiner), married John Weitzel, late of
Reading, Pennsylvania.

Source: Page(s) 585-587, History of Armstrong County, Pennsylvania by
Robert Walker Smith, Esq. Chicago: Waterman, Watkins & Co., 1883.
Transcribed November 1998 by Debra Shelkeyt for the Armstrong County Smith
Project.
Contributed by Debra Shelkeyt for use by the Armstrong County Genealogy
Project (http://www.pa-roots.com/armstrong/)

Armstrong County Genealogy Project Notice:
These electronic pages cannot be reproduced in any format, for any
presentation, without prior written permission.

Return to the Biographical Index

Return to the Smith Project

About Author

Leave a Comment

General Daniel Brodhead


HEADER

General Daniel Brodhead

GEN. DANIEL BRODHEAD, of Revolutionary fame, was born in Marbletown, Ulster
Co., N.Y., in 1736, and died and was buried in Milford, Pa., Nov. 15, 1809. He
was the great-grandson of Capt. Daniel Brodhead, of the English army, who came
to this country in 1664, as a member of the expedition commanded by Col.
Richard Nichols, in the service of King Charles II, after the Restoration.
After the surrender of Stuyvesant Captain Brodhead was sent up to Albany, in
September, 1664, and was a witness to the treaty made with the Indians there
in that month. He was afterward promoted to the command of the military forces
of Ulster county, by commission from King Charles, dated Sept. 14, 1665, which
position he held till his death in 1670. He left one daughter and two
sons–Ann, Charles, and Richard.

Richard Brodhead was born at Marbletown, N.Y., in 1666, and was the
grandfather of General Brodhead. He had two sons, Richard, Jr., and Daniel,
the latter born in Marbletown, Ulster Co., N.Y., in the year 1698. He died at
Bethlehem, Pa., in the year 1755. This Daniel Brodhead, the General’s father,
removed with his family from Ulster County, N.Y., in the year 1737, to
Danville, Pa., while his son Daniel was but an infant. The latter was the
youngest of his three sons who reached maturity and married. Inured to the
dangers of the Indian frontier from his very cradle, the impression made as he
grew up among the scenes of Indian barbarities, and the outrages of the
savages, helped to form his future character and to mold him into the grand,
successful soldier and Indian fighter which his subsequent history proved him
to be.

General Brodhead first appeared prominently in public life when he was
elected a deuty from Berks County to a provincial meeting which met at
Philadelphia, July 15, 1774, and served on a committee which reported sixteen
resolutions, one of which recommended the calling of a Continental Congress
and acts of non-importation and non-exportation from Great Britain. These were
among the first steps toward the Revolution which followed. At the beginning
of the war of the Revolution he was commissioned by the assembly of
Pennsylvania at Philadelphia as colonel of the 8th Regiment, Pa. Colonial
Troops. He first participated in the battle of Long Island. Before the close
of this battle he commanded the whole of the Pennsylvania contingent troops,
composed of several battalions. He was especially mentioned by Washington in
his report to Congress on this battle, for brave and meritorious conduct. He
also participated in several other battles of the Revolution. Having received
the approbation of Washington he was sent by him, in June, 1778, with his
troops to Fort Muncy, where he rebuilt that fort formerly destroyed by the
Indians, which command he held until Washington, in the following spring,
recommended his selection to Congress for the command of the Western
department. Washington, being personally acquainted and warmly attached to
him, knew well his qualifications as a brave, judicious and competent general.
Washington, with the sanction of Congress, issued an order, dated March 5,
1779, directing him to proceed to Fort Pitt, Pa., to take charge of the
Western department, extending from the British possessions, at Detroit, on the
north, to the French possessions (Louisianna) on the south, a command and
responsibility equal to any in the Revolutionary army.

General Brodhead established the headquarters of his department at Fort
Pitt, now Pittsburgh, Pa. He had under his command the posts of Fort Pitt,
Fort McIntosh, Fort Laurens, Fort Tuscarora, Fort Wheeling, Fort Armstrong,
and Fort Holliday’s Cove. He made a number of successful expeditions in person
against the Indians with a large part of his command. In 1779 he executed a
brilliant march up the Allegheny with 605 men, penetrating into New York,
overcoming almost insurmountable difficulties, through a wilderness without
roads, driving the Indians before him, depopulating and destroying their
villages all along the route, killing and capturing many. This expedition
began Aug. 11 and ended Sept. 14, 1779, between three hudred and four hundred
miles in thirty-three days, through a wilderness without a road. General
Brodhead received the thanks of Congress for this expedition, and the
following acknowledgement from General Washington: “The activity,
perseverance and firmness which marketed the conduct of General Brodhead, and
that of all the officers and men of every description in this expedition, do
them great honor, and their services entitle them to the thanks and to this
testimonial of the general’s acknowledgement.”

A great number of the thrilling Indian stories of which we read in the
present day occurred under General Brodhead’s command. The famous Captain
Brady was a captain in General Brodhead’s 8th Regiment, and seldom ever went
out on a scout but by orders from the General. General Brodhead’s devotion to
the cause of liberty was untiring. He never doubted the result of the war, and
his letters of encouragement to General Washington and others are part of the
history of our country. In one, lamenting the coldness of some former
patriots, he writes: “There is nothing I so much fear as a dishonorable
peace. For Heaven’s sake, let every good man hold up his hands against it. We
have never suffered half I expected we should, and I am willing to suffer much
more for the glorious cause for which I have and wish to bleed.”

General Brodhead had a treble warfare to wage-a warfare which required the
genius and daring of a soldier, the diplomacy of a statesman and the good,
hard sense and clear judgment of an independent ruler over an extensive
country composed of a variety of elements. He waged war upon the unfriendly
Indians, and held as allies in friendship several friendly nations. He watched
and controlled, to a great extent, the British influence upon the Indians in
the direction of Detroit. He kept in subjection a large Tory element west of
the mountains in sympathy with Great Britain, and punished them by
confiscating their surplus stores and provisions for the benefit of his
starving soldiers, when they had refused to sell to his commissary officers on
the credit of the government; but he never resorted to this punishment until
his starving soldiers paraded in a body in front of his quarters and announced
they had had no bread for 5 days.

On June 24, 1779, General Brodhead issued his famous order directing
Colonel Bayard to proceed to Kittanning and erect a fort at that point for the
protectin of all settlers desiring to settle in that vicinity, and for the
better protection of the frontier. After the erection of this fort settlers
took up land and built their houses around and in the vicinity of this fort,
under its protection, until the accumulation of houses and homes in the
vicinity transformed the Indian town of Kittanning into the present thriving
capital of Armstrong County, which can only justly and truthfully be
acknowledged the result of the fort erected by command of General Brodhead,
and which he was too modest to have called after himself, regardless of the
importunate efforts of Colonel Bayard, whom history shows to have earnestly
entreated Brodhead to permit him to call it Fort Brodhead.

General Brodhead’s untiring watchfulness of the settlements along the
Allegheny, the building of his fort at Kittanning, his protection of the
inhabitants in its vicinity until they became numerous enough to defend
themselves, his modesty in not permitting the fort to be called after himself,
justly entitle him to the credit of being founder of Kittanning, just as the
erecting of every fort on our western frontier from that day to this has been
the foundationof a city or town which invariably sprang from such a planting,
as Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, Leavenworth, Fort Dodge, Detroit, for never until
that time had Kittanning any white inhabitants, and never from that time until
the present has it been without white inhabitants.

In 1781 General Brodhead was given command of the 1st Pa. Colonial
Regiment, and during that year received his full commission as general. His
services extended through the entire war of the Revolution, and at its close
he was elected by the officers assembled at the cantonment of the American
army on the Hudson River, May 10, 1783, as one of a committee to prepare the
necessary papers for the organization of the Society of the Cincinnati. In
1789 General Brodhead was elected by the Pennsylvania Assembly surveyor
general of the State of Pennsylvania, which position he held for nearly twelve
years.

For his services in the Revolution General Brodhead received several
thousand acres of land, which he located in western Pennsylvania. Besides this
he purchased largely of land through western Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
Kentucky. He located much land in the vicinity of Kittanning and on the
Allegheny, the scenes of his former exploits, which he never ceased to love.
General Brodhead was twice married, and by his first wife, Elizabeth (Dupuy),
had two children, Daniel and Ann Garton. The son, Daniel, Jr., was wounded at
the battle of Long Island and captured, was exchanged, and died soon
afterward. Like his father he was a member of the Society of the Cincinnati.
The General’s second marriage was to the widow of Gen. Samuel Mifflin. His
only daughter, Ann Garton, married Casper Heiner, of Reading, Pa., a surveyor
by profession and author of a series of mathematical works.

To Ann Garton Heiner and her children General Brodhead left all his lands
and property. Ann Garton Heiner had but one son, John Heiner, who removed to
Kittanning in 1812, and took possession of all the lands left him by his
grandfather, General Brodhead. Capt. John Heiner died and was buried in
Indiana, Pa., in 1833. He left but one son, Daniel Brodhead Heiner, late of
Kittanning, Pa., and three daughters: Ann Eliza, who married John Mechling,
sheriff of Armstrong County from 1845 to 1848; Margaret, who was twice
married, first to a Mr. Carson, later to a Mr. Porterfield, and moved to
Sidney, Ill.; and Catherine, wife of Gov. George W. Smith, of Lawrence,
Kansas.

Ann Garton (Brodhead) Heiner had, besides her son John, four daughters. (1)
Rebecca was the mother of Hon. Henry Johnson, of Muncy, Pa., presidential
elector in 1848 on the Whig ticket, State senator of Pennsylvania from 1861 to
1864, and chairman of the Judiciary committee and author of the bill to
entitle soldiers to vote in the field (after the Supreme court of Pennsylvania
had decided their voting unconstitutional). She was the grandmother of Hon.
Henry John Brodhead Cummings, colonel of the 39th Iowa Infantry during the war
of the Rebellion, and member of Congress from the Des Moines district from
1877 to 1879. (2) Margaret married John Faulk, and was the mother of Hon.
Andrew J. Faulk, governor of Dakota, from Aug. 4, 1866, to May 1, 1869, also
superintendent of Indian Affairs for Dakota and member of the committee-with
Gen. William T. Sherman, General SStanley and others-which made the famous
treaty with the Sioux Indians at Fort Sully, Dak., in 1868. (3) Catherine
married Colonel Brodhead, a distant cousin, descendant of a brother of Gen.
Daniel Brodhead. General Brodhead’s descendants by this marriage were the
children of George Brodhead, of Kittanning; Mark Brodhead, of Washington; Mrs.
Kate Van Wyke, wife of United States Senator Van Wyke, of Nebraska, and Mrs.
Van Auken, wife of John Van Auken, member of Congress from Pike county from
1867 to 1871. (4) Mary married John Weitzel, of Reading, Pennsylvania.

Source: Pages 984-987, Armstrong County, Pa., Her People, Past and
Present, J.H. Beers & Co., 1914
Transcribed December 1998 by Sharon Doyle-Dantzer for the Armstrong County
Beers Project
Contributed for use by the Armstrong County Genealogy Project (http://www.pa-roots.com/armstrong/)

Armstrong County Genealogy Project Notice:

These electronic pages cannot be reproduced in any format, for any presentation, without prior written permission.

Return to the Beers Project

 

Return to the
Armstrong County Genealogy Project

(c) Armstrong County
Genealogy Project

 

Return to the
Armstrong County Genealogy Project

(c) Armstrong County
Genealogy Project

Return to the
Armstrong County Genealogy Project

(c) Armstrong County
Genealogy Project

About Author

Leave a Comment